Posted on 03/06/2018 11:11:29 AM PST by C19fan
For the first time, a Belgian criminal court has convicted a man of “sexism in the public space,” for verbally abusing a female police officer who tried to question him after he was seen jaywalking.
The man, whose name was not disclosed, was convicted of sexism, slander and threatening a police officer, and fined 3,000 euros, or $3,725. He did not appear in court, and he can appeal the conviction, but failure to pay the fine could land him in prison, officials said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Illegal possession of testicles.
His defense should be that he identifies as a woman so he cannot be sexist. He should probably start wearing dresses now.
I’ll go out on a limb here...first name “Muhammed”...
I'm so confused. I thought Muslims were higher than Women on the Aggrieved Victim Immunity Scale. Surely this will be overturned on appeal!
>
He did not appear in court, and he can appeal the conviction, but failure to pay the fine could land him in prison, officials said.
>
As typical of govt, you can string out the process as long as you’d like...but you’d BETTER pay up front.
“Shut your mouth, I don’t talk to women, being a police officer is not a job for women,” the man told the female police officer during the arrest.
Now against the law to utter a politically incorrect opinion.
Stifle it Edith.
With this nonsense rearing its head, each officer MUST have a recorder operating at all times to support this; otherwise, no recording, no crime.
Not a Muslim. They would not have charged him if he was a Muslim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.