The analysis just says that the Mantis appears to have 3D vision.
That does not undermine TToE even the tiniest bit. It just says that is how the Manis evolved.
It is just a strawman argument: “The Mantis evolved differently therefore TToE must be false.”
Also, it does not address the fact that there are probably billions of unexplored insects who may or may not have stereo vision.
Unique features in a species have no meaning, one way or the other.
“It just says that is how the Manis evolved.”
This seems to be an assertion without evidence - indicating assumption and pre-belief.
.... only if you can explain two things:
(1) irreducible complexity....(make sure you realize what that actually implies), and,
(2) lack of (predicted by TToE) fossil evidence.
how does something that is irreducibly complex evolve step by step?
That does not undermine TToE even the tiniest bit.
...
But the deceivers at the ICR say it does.