Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mika Tries to Drag Melania into Stormy Daniels Story: She “Can’t Overlook” It
FinkelBlog ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 03/14/2018 5:52:27 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: DouglasKC

“Does anyone realize that this NDA does NOT mention Donald Trump ever? And it does NOT mention Stormy Daniels or her real name? It has “David Dennison” and someone else. Stormy Daniels says ‘David Dennison’ is REALLY Donald Trump. Which of course makes the NDA complete fiction.”

The NDA does mention Trump through the “side agreement”
document, which specifies who the aliases actually are in the NDA.

It’s blacked out at the moment, but there’s little doubt that David Dennison refers to Donald Trump.

There’s little point in arguing that the affair did not occur, imo.

Once you tell me $130K was paid to a porn star right before an election, I pretty much know why.

There’s no other reason for such an elaborate agreement and subsequent signed statements, imo.

Accept the affair from 12 years ago and move on, and hope that the recent payment does not turn out to be illegal.


61 posted on 03/14/2018 9:47:25 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Mika’s an ugly woman... plastic surgery and make-up can’t cover the ugliness that pushes out of her every pore...


62 posted on 03/14/2018 10:25:06 AM PDT by GOPJ (Blaming the NRA for what liberals have caused. - freeper I want the USA back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Yeller

I saw a TV special where he showed up to help the staff at his hotels, trying to putting himself into their shoes. He’d make the beds but he wouldn’t scrub the toilets. And he apologized to the woman he was helping for not being able to help her clean the bathroom. I was wondering if he was too proud, but he did all the other chores.


63 posted on 03/14/2018 11:30:18 AM PDT by neefer (We're walking real proud and we're talking real loud again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

I wasn’t aware Daniels was trying to make her story known, but it seems odd that the press couldn’t miss an affair with a porn star especially after the release of the Hollywood video. And I’m not saying he isn’t above an affair, but I can’t see it with this woman. As I mentioned in the other post, she would not have been a low profile mistress. It seems most people have affairs with people who have proximity - co-worker, nanny, housekeeper, etc.


64 posted on 03/14/2018 11:37:35 AM PDT by neefer (We're walking real proud and we're talking real loud again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: neefer

“I wasn’t aware Daniels was trying to make her story known, but it seems odd that the press couldn’t miss an affair with a porn star especially after the release of the Hollywood video. And I’m not saying he isn’t above an affair, but I can’t see it with this woman. As I mentioned in the other post, she would not have been a low profile mistress. It seems most people have affairs with people who have proximity - co-worker, nanny, housekeeper, etc.”

I think it’s probably because all there is is the affair, and that’s not a big deal these days.

If she had the goods on Trump, she wouldn’t need to raise money for a legal defense, a Trump opponent would bankroll her gladly for something big that would hurt Trump.


65 posted on 03/14/2018 12:15:03 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Wonder if Joe’s former wife “overlooked” Mika?

How about Hillary — did she rush out and divorce Horndog-in-Chief?

Yegads, the hypocrisy.


66 posted on 03/14/2018 1:38:59 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (We're even doing the right thing for them. They just don't know it yet. --Donald Trump, CPAC '18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
“Does anyone realize that this NDA does NOT mention Donald Trump ever? And it does NOT mention Stormy Daniels or her real name? It has “David Dennison” and someone else. Stormy Daniels says ‘David Dennison’ is REALLY Donald Trump. Which of course makes the NDA complete fiction.” The NDA does mention Trump through the “side agreement” document, which specifies who the aliases actually are in the NDA. It’s blacked out at the moment, but there’s little doubt that David Dennison refers to Donald Trump.

What's the "Side document"? Is there a link to it somewhere...anywhere? And if they go to the trouble of making an NDA with fake names and then have a "side document" to explain who these people REALLY are then what's the sense of having fake names in the nda in the first place?

67 posted on 03/14/2018 2:07:26 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

Why should a person accept that which they did not do.

Would you do that?


68 posted on 03/14/2018 2:11:36 PM PDT by dforest (Never let a Muslim cut your hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: neefer

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5501597/Donald-Trump-Jr-wife-Vanessa-expected-file-divorce.html


69 posted on 03/14/2018 5:34:31 PM PDT by pugmama (Ports Moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Trump’s lawyer hasn’t claimed the NDA and side agreement are fake.

Why hasn’t he done that?

Instead, he has stated in public that he paid Clifford $130K from his home equity line.

It’s not rocket science here.


70 posted on 03/15/2018 3:59:54 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Why would Trump’s lawyer enter into an NDA with Clifford, and pay Clifford $130K out of a personal home equity line?

It’s blatantly obvious that something went on between Trump and Clifford.

The problem is not the obvious affair, but the payment 12 years later near election day.

It’s the payment that will sink Cohen and damage Trump.

Cohen is clearly in trouble for that payment, imo.


71 posted on 03/15/2018 4:04:48 AM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: pugmama

How sad. Thanks for letting me know.


72 posted on 03/15/2018 5:56:51 AM PDT by neefer (We're walking real proud and we're talking real loud again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson