Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
That is where it doesn't make sense. On one hand he is not licensed to develop a ride, then the article keeps calling the design "his."

The fault lies with the company that accepted the design and built it. He is going to walk unless the lack of maintenance is proven to have contributed to the death.

19 posted on 03/27/2018 11:23:59 AM PDT by Salvavida (The Missouri citizen's militia sends its regards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Salvavida

I am not sure how they got the ride built, but I know that they skipped a great deal of the design testing. They ran some of the actual ride testing in the dark to keep people from seeing what could happen on the ride. When they saw that the rafts went airborne they added the net with the support bars, which are completely out of compliance with amusement park rides.

The park covered up other injuries on the ride. They lied about maintenance on the ride. They tried to get a copy of a hospital or police report from another family about another incident on the ride, and lied to both that family and the police in order to get it.


31 posted on 03/27/2018 12:15:29 PM PDT by BeckyRoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson