Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK stats: Cut govít sex ed funding and teen pregnancy rates drop
LifeSite ^ | Mar 29, 2018 | SPUC

Posted on 03/30/2018 11:06:59 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o

March 29, 2018 (Society for the Protection of Unborn Children) – New statistics show that 21.7% of all conceptions in England and Wales led to legal abortion in 2016.

The Office of National Statistics' report Conceptions in England and Wales: 2016 found that the percentage of conceptions leading to a legal abortion in 2016 increased for women in all age groups since 2015, apart from women aged 40 and over. Women aged 30 to 34 years had the lowest percentage of conceptions leading to legal abortion (14.2%) in 2016, whereas women aged under 16 years had the highest percentage (61.5%). Over the last two decades the percentage of conceptions leading to a legal abortion has generally increased for women aged under 30 years, decreased for women aged 35 and over and remained relatively stable for women aged 30 to 34 years.

Overall fall in conceptions

The statistics, which "are derived from combining numbers of maternities and abortions using information recorded at birth registration and abortion notification" (miscarriages and illegal abortions are not included) reveal several other interesting points.

The figure attracting headlines is the fact that the overall conception rate in England and Wales in 2016 was the lowest recorded since 2005, with the Daily Mail leading with "Pregnancy rate in England and Wales falls to 11-YEAR low with only women aged over 40 bucking the trend."

Fewer abortions to married couples

The report also compares the conception and abortion rates between those who are married and not. 58% of conceptions (and births) occurred outside marriage or civil partnership in 2016. This represents the culmination of a long-term rise (it was 55% in 2005 and 51% in 1998). Tellingly, 68% of conceptions outside marriage or civil partnership resulted in a maternity (live birth or stillbirth), compared with 92% of conceptions within marriage or civil partnership.

Fall in teen pregnancy and abortion rates

The ONS statistics also reveal that the rates of teenage pregnancy have continued to fall. The conception rate among women aged 15 to 17 was 18.9 per thousand - the lowest since comparable statistics were first produced in 1969. The fall in the under-18 conception rate in 2016, compared with 2015, consists of falls in both the conception rate leading to a maternity (decreased by 11%) and the conception rate leading to abortion (decreased by 9.3%). The under-18 conception rate has now declined by 60% since 1998 and by 55% since 2007.

But what's behind it?

The report suggests several factors that might be behind the reduction, including government sex education programmes, a shift in aspirations by young women towards education, and the perception of stigma associated with being a teenage mother. However, research by Prof David Paton of the University of Nottingham cautions against associating the fall in teenage pregnancy rates with sex education programmes in schools. Last year, he conducted an analysis which found that teen pregnancy and abortion rates actually fell more in areas where there had been funding cuts to teenage pregnancy programmes.

Challenge to compulsory sex ed plans

Commenting on the ONS report, Prof Paton said: "The decline in teenage pregnancies seen in the 2016 conception figures comes 8 years after sexual health services started to be cut and 6 years after the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy was abolished. It is quite striking that the decline in teenage pregnancies has, if anything, accelerated the more that sexual health services have been cut. The latest figures present a challenge to the Government's plans to force all primary schools to introduce sex education and to limit the rights of parents to withdraw children from inappropriate sex ed. The current situation in which decisions over sex education are left to schools and in which parents are, in theory at least, fully involved has proved no barrier to reducing teen pregnancy in England."

Published with permission from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: abortion; sexeducation; teenpregnancy
Seems counter-intuitive, but the introduction of Sex-Ed and of contraceptives to the young, or to new populations, historically results in rise in both abortion and nonmarital pregnancy.

Reduction of access to contraception or contraception funding, results in less abortion and less nonmarital pregnancy.

It may have something to do with perception of risk, and how this modifies behavior.

It also has to do with the perception of sex itself, as a kind of pet activity (to be managed by veterinary medicine) vs as a carefully reserved gift of sacred and exclusive intimacy.

1 posted on 03/30/2018 11:06:59 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Mrs. Don-o ~

Excellent post (and reply). Professor Paton ‘gets it’, shout it from the rooftops!

2 posted on 03/30/2018 11:17:45 AM PDT by heterosupremacist (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. - (Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Maybe the kids are thinking that having sex goes toward their overall grade...

3 posted on 03/30/2018 12:03:45 PM PDT by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I like your last paragraph. Keep sex out of the school lesson plans as a black and white activity like brushing one’s teeth. Keep teen minds thinking of it as private, intimate, embarrassing, romantic. You are onto something.

In my day it was hit over our heads in every which way in sex Ed. I got the impression everyone was having sex all the time. It was not mysterious sacred or romantic. Every cop or soap style show on tv had multiple partners every week. My honest impression of life was that everyone was screwing everyone else.

4 posted on 03/30/2018 12:09:10 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; All

Thank you for referencing that article Mrs. Don-o. Please note that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

As a side note to this thread, please consider the following.

Regarding federal sex education in US INTRAstate schools, please note the following.

Military issues aside, patriots are reminded that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification feds the specific power to make policy or tax and spend in the name of intrastate schooling, unwelcome federal involvement in intrastate schooling unconstitutional, but also consider the following.

Just us US citizens have to ask what a federal bill actually does regardless that we know the title of a bill, citizens need to question what unconstitutional federal involvement in classrooms is actually teaching the kids about sex for example.

5 posted on 03/30/2018 12:48:18 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

There is nothing wrong with a little fear as opposed to a little information with no moral platform behind it.

6 posted on 03/30/2018 3:20:04 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Seems counter-intuitive...It may have something to do with perception of risk, and how this modifies behavior.

'Never seemed counter-intuitive to me: "risk" was a biggy.

But there were no Co-Ed dorms nor sex education in my day.

7 posted on 04/01/2018 1:20:47 AM PDT by Does so (Let's make the word Mohammedism--adding it to other ISMs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson