Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In for a Penny, in for Impound (almost line-item veto)
WSJ ^ | Kimberley A. Strassel

Posted on 04/05/2018 1:33:21 PM PDT by RoosterRedux

Plenty of Republicans remain bitter that their party passed that bloated $1.3 trillion omnibus—almost as bitter as President Trump, who felt pressured to sign it. But this fight doesn’t have to be over.

Across Washington, principled conservatives are noodling with an idea that—if done right—could be a political winner. It’s a chance for Republicans to honor their promises of spending restraint and redeem themselves with a base turned off by the omnibus blowout. It’s an opening for the GOP to highlight the degree to which Democrats used the bill to hold the military hostage to their own domestic boondoggles. And it’s a chance for Mr. Trump to present himself again as an outsider, willing to use unconventional means to change Washington’s spending culture.

It’s called the 1974 Impoundment Act, which allows the president to order the rescission of specific funds, so long as Congress approves those cuts within 45 days. The act hasn’t seen a lot of use in recent decades. Barack Obama never saw a spending bill he didn’t like, and George W. Bush never sent any formal rescission proposals to Congress—likely because he took the position that presidents ought to have a fuller line-item veto power. Many conservatives agree, though Ronald Reagan used rescission where he could and holds the title for most proposals. Even so, the total amount all presidents since 1974 have put forward for rescission ($76 billion) and the amount Congress ultimately approved ($25 billion) remains pathetic.

Republicans could change that. Their control of the White House and both chambers gives them an unusual opportunity to cut big. Under the Impoundment Act, a simple majority is enough to approve presidential rescissions—no filibuster. It’s a chance to take a hacksaw to the $128 billion by which the omnibus exceeded the 2011 domestic-spending caps...

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: budget; cutspending; impoundment; impoundmentact; lineitemveto; nofilibuster; pocketveto; republicanmajority; rescission; shutdown; trump; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 04/05/2018 1:33:21 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“””Republicans could change that.”””

But RINOs wouldn’t do it.


2 posted on 04/05/2018 1:35:53 PM PDT by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Just watch Kim Strassel explain this to David Asman on Fox Biz’s “After the Bell.”


3 posted on 04/05/2018 1:36:53 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Churchill: Success is not final, failure is not fatal. It is the courage to continue that counts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

the Republicans do NOT control both chambers of congress...

that’s only in titular form, an appearance

the RINOs are in bed with the commie/nazi D’s...swamp critters all.... it is that cabal that controls congress


4 posted on 04/05/2018 1:44:00 PM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicans aren't born, they're excreted." -Marcus Tillius Cicero (3 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux; All

“Republicans could change that. Their control of the White House and both chambers gives them an unusual opportunity to cut big.”

Kimberly? Sweetheart? I sure WISH I could believe you, but I just can’t. I HOPE they prove me wrong. I will GLADLY be wrong.

Please! Prove me wrong, Republicans!


5 posted on 04/05/2018 1:44:31 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

Exactly. Fingers crossed... not holding my breath.


6 posted on 04/05/2018 2:34:13 PM PDT by eternalgreenknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Cut, baby, cut!


7 posted on 04/05/2018 2:39:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Republicans don’t control the Senate


8 posted on 04/05/2018 2:42:00 PM PDT by bert (RE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Republicans have, at best, 50 votes in the Senate plus McCain when he’s up to it. Depending on what ox is getting gored it isn’t likely they’ll get that many.


9 posted on 04/05/2018 2:53:31 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thank God you're here, Jim.

No one else sees the opportunity here.

It's a great challenge but the talk is that the WH is really excited about this.

10 posted on 04/05/2018 3:15:23 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Churchill: Success is not final, failure is not fatal. It is the courage to continue that counts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Pence can cast the deciding vote.


11 posted on 04/05/2018 4:37:05 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: erkelly
Pence can cast the deciding vote.

Assuming it's a tie. Right now with McCain's presence iffy it's 50 to 49. All the Democrats need is one defection.

12 posted on 04/05/2018 4:38:58 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I’m afraid you’re laboring under the delusion that most Republicans in Congress WANT Trump to succeed.


13 posted on 04/05/2018 4:42:21 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative
Wait and see.

I might be wrong...but let's wait and see.

14 posted on 04/05/2018 4:45:36 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (Churchill: Success is not final, failure is not fatal. It is the courage to continue that counts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
All the Democrats need is one defection.

Flake and/or Collins.
15 posted on 04/05/2018 5:03:16 PM PDT by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
Flake and/or Collins.

Or Corker. Or Graham. Or Rubio.

16 posted on 04/05/2018 6:23:45 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

And what if a Democrat defects?


17 posted on 04/05/2018 6:36:03 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
And what if a Democrat defects?

LOL! All the cuts are going to be to programs the Democrats like. They aren't going to defect.

18 posted on 04/05/2018 6:43:23 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux; ransomnote; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; ...

p


19 posted on 04/05/2018 6:44:46 PM PDT by bitt (The first to squeal gets the best deal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I think these rescissions don’t need to be done all as one package. President Trump should have his staff go through the Omnibus and dig out a dozen or so of the most ridiculous spending items, stuff that even a Democrat would be hesitant to support once it’s out in the open.

Run those dozen items through as a package and I’ll bet it would get 60-70 Senate votes.

Then find the next dozen and repeat the process. Continue until you can’t get 50 votes in the Senate. Maybe they’d even get down to forcing an open vote on whether Planned Parenthood needs a half billion dollars of our tax money.

Actually, this could be made into a pretty good game show if Trump puts some effort into it. Tweet out all twelve of the first spending items. I’ll guarantee you the there are at least a dozen items so ridiculous that the public would never support them.


20 posted on 04/05/2018 6:46:23 PM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson