Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SpaceX proposes to conduct Dragon splashdowns in Gulf of Mexico
Space News ^ | 4/10/2018 | Jeff Foust

Posted on 04/10/2018 8:31:56 AM PDT by Elderberry

SpaceX is seeking permission to perform splashdowns of its Dragon spacecraft in the Gulf of Mexico, part of a shift in spacecraft recovery operations from the Pacific Ocean.

In a draft environmental assessment prepared by the Federal Aviation Administration, SpaceX proposes to conduct up to six Dragon landings a year in waters off the Gulf coast, between Texas and Florida. The assessment, completed in March, was published in the Federal Register April 5.

According to the report, the Gulf of Mexico would serve as a contingency landing site for both cargo and crewed Dragon missions should the primary landing zone be unavailable. SpaceX currently lands Dragon spacecraft in the Pacific Ocean and has approval to carry out future splashdowns in the Atlantic.

The need for the backup landing zone, the report states, is to ensure the future crewed Dragon spacecraft can return to Earth should there be a problem with the primary landing site. “With the introduction of the [commercial crew program], the ability to return crew to Earth in a safe and timely manner is extremely important, particularly in cases where human life or health may be in jeopardy,” the report states, adding that the proposal “ensures that a secondary splashdown option is available to missions planned to splashdown in either the Pacific or Atlantic Oceans.”

The landing site is in waters between 28 and 260 kilometers offshore from the Gulf coast, in waters that are within the U.S. economic exclusion zone, but doesn’t specify preferred regions within that area. The site would support missions launched from Florida as well as the launch site SpaceX is developing near Brownsville, Texas.

For those splashdowns, the planned recovery fleet includes one ship, nearly 50 meters long, and several smaller rigid-hulled inflatable boats.

(Excerpt) Read more at spacenews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dragon; elonmusk; falcon9; falconheavy; gulfofmexico; nasa; spacex

1 posted on 04/10/2018 8:31:56 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

The GoM also has the advantage of being a much calmer body of
water than either the Atlantic or Pacific, except, of course during hurricane transit. Of course the same applies to the Atlantic and Pacific.


2 posted on 04/10/2018 8:38:19 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

They have very bright minds and likely a lot of computing power at their disposal, but a re-entry burn executed at the wrong time could send the capsule into west central Florida instead of the GoM.


3 posted on 04/10/2018 8:42:33 AM PDT by rarestia (Repeal the 17th Amendment and ratify Article the First to give the power back to the people!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpX-DM2

1st Crewed Dragon is supposed to launch this year.

BuhBye Soyuz.


4 posted on 04/10/2018 8:43:52 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Well my aerospace loving 13 year old is excited, since we live 5 miles from the Gulf.


5 posted on 04/10/2018 8:46:04 AM PDT by pinkandgreenmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

There are 175 oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico....

https://www.statista.com/statistics/279100/number-of-offshore-rigs-worldwide-by-region/


6 posted on 04/10/2018 8:47:32 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Better look out for oil and gas rigs and deep sea fishing charters..................and the occasional cruise ship..............


7 posted on 04/10/2018 8:50:05 AM PDT by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

GMTA!.......................does that include the Mexican rigs?....................


8 posted on 04/10/2018 8:50:50 AM PDT by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Cruise ships could offer splashdown viewing tours!


9 posted on 04/10/2018 8:52:49 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SpinnerWebb

I would think Eglin AFB and Tyndall AFB would put up a big fight over this decision................


10 posted on 04/10/2018 8:54:57 AM PDT by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

What do you mean?


11 posted on 04/10/2018 9:15:07 AM PDT by Cats Pajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

The AF uses huge tracts of the Gulf for testing and training.

They don’t like unnecessary distractions in their areas.

They would definitely not like this one...........


12 posted on 04/10/2018 9:17:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Noted. Thanks.


13 posted on 04/10/2018 10:04:53 AM PDT by Cats Pajamas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

Sometimes the AF gets a little too protective of their areas.

The Santa Rosa County wanted to open up a pass to the Gulf of Mexico from Navarre’s Santa Rosa Sound. It would involve dredging an old pass that used to be there and slowly filled in over the decades. It would be about 100 yards or so long and allow people direct access to the Gulf of Mexico from Navarre and surrounding areas. Otherwise they have to go 20 miles to either east or west ends of Santa Rosa Island to get to the Gulf. It would have been a huge boon to tourism and property values. It would have also provided a flushing out of the dead sound waters with clean Gulf waters.

BUT, since the AF owned the property adjacent to the proposed pass, they objected using their tired excuse, “It would interfere with our mission.” so it was effectively nixed, permanently.

Now, maybe the next hurricane will open it up naturally, as it was a hurricane that created it, and they can’t say a damn thing....................


14 posted on 04/10/2018 10:17:23 AM PDT by Red Badger (The people who call Trump a tyrant are the same people who want the president to confiscate weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yeah, they can fly through or over them, but I think even the USAF would find it will lose an argument with a hurricane!


15 posted on 04/10/2018 8:32:43 PM PDT by Paul R. (I don't want to be energy free, we want to be energy dominant in terms of the world. -D. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson