Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wear: GOP asks: Should all toll road projects be subject to public vote?
The Austin American-Statesman ^ | February 23, 2018 | Ben Wear

Posted on 04/10/2018 11:11:26 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The distinction between how rail and road projects can happen in Central Texas — state law requires Capital Metro to ask voters for permission to build or expand a rail line, while road builders can proceed, even on a tollway project, without an election — has always rankled transit supporters.

The Legislature added that requirement for Capital Metro rail elections in 1997 when the agency was in turmoil and anti-rail lawmakers held sway. Since then, area voters have OK’d one rail project — the MetroRail commuter line in 2004 — and twice said no to light rail (that second rejection, however, was of a city of Austin bond election rather than a Capital Metro vote). The expensive projects can be a tough sell.

The Texas Department of Transportation and Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, meanwhile, have completed nine toll projects and have two others under construction, borrowing close to $4 billion in the process. With nary an election. Would Central Texans have approved all those toll roads if given a say upfront? Any of them?

We’ll never know.

That’s why I find it fascinating that the Texas Republican Party, in the primary election going on right now, put this nonbinding, yes-or-no question before GOP voters: “No governmental entity should ever construct or fund construction of toll roads without voter approval.”

Bear in mind, these ballot questions in primaries almost always are put on there by party leaders to elicit a resounding “yes” from the faithful. Those clearly stated leanings then can be brought to bear on lawmakers at the next legislative session or on Congress. Texas Republicans have 11 of these questions on the March primary ballot (including the abolition of abortion, the repeal of Obamacare and a proposition approximating the failed bathroom bill from last year’s legislative session), and Democrats have a dozen (among them several enumerating rights to vote, universal health care, economic security and a fair justice system).

So, here you have the Republican Party — which, through the strenuous efforts of former Gov. Rick Perry and his friend Ric Williamson in the century’s first decade, brought the toll road wave to Texas — seemingly asking its members to endorse putting an obstacle in the way of building more.

Well, yes and no.

RELATED: Looking back at the Texas toll road revolution.

Distaste for tolls

The Texas Transportation Commission last fall was headed toward changes to its 10-year construction plan that would have included at least 15 toll projects in the state’s largest cities. Among those were projects to add toll lanes to Interstate 35 through Central Texas, and U.S. 183 in Northwest Austin.

Their reasoning? Even with the more than $4 billion in additional tax money annually for the Texas Department of Transportation approved by Texas voters in 2014 and 2015 through constitutional amendments, TxDOT will still need billions more to build these urban megaprojects. The Interstate 35 makeover from Round Rock to San Marcos, in TxDOT’s most recent estimate, would cost $8 billion all by its lonesome.

But then a large faction of GOP grass-roots groups (many of them affiliated with the tea party) sent out an open letter blasting that plan, arguing that those constitutional amendments specifically prohibited spending that money on toll projects. And TxDOT officials, to be frank, were trying to get cute with that prohibition, saying they’d spend the restricted money to add free lanes on these highways and borrowed money to do the toll elements.

That’s sort of like me hiring a contractor to renovate my home, and saying I’ll pay him for the new roof and gutter work with borrowed money and the new kitchen and bathroom with cash from my bank account. To the contractor, and the banker, the money is all the same shade of green.

Beyond distaste with that sort of financial finagling, those GOP groups really don’t want more toll roads built. In fact, many of them would like to find a way to remove tolls from existing turnpikes.

So in November, first Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and then Gov. Greg Abbott, who appoints TxDOT’s board members, trashed that TxDOT plan, and suddenly the toll roads were excised from it.

All of which is a problem for those who, looking at already choking urban traffic in Texas and the near-certain prospects of booming population, say the highway system has to be expanded. That includes much of the state’s business community, the more establishmentarian Republicans and many Democrats.

And they know that the Legislature, which hasn’t raised the state’s 20-cents-a-gallon gas tax since 1991, isn’t going to do so anytime soon. And Congress, which hasn’t nudged the federal 18.4-cents-a-gallon gas tax since 1993, likewise is unlikely to increase that one anytime soon.

Yes, President Donald Trump a couple of weeks ago unexpectedly said he might support a whopping 25-cents-a-gallon increase in the federal levy, echoing a call from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. But Trump says a lot of things. Highway advocates aren’t counting on pennies from Washington.

Public toll vote?

So, in this complex and confounding political environment, requiring a public vote on building a toll road project might in fact be the only way to get one done. Ask Travis County residents right now if they’d support tolls for added lanes to I-35 — no tax increase, just charges for those who choose to use the lanes like on North MoPac Boulevard (Loop 1) — and a majority just might say yes. Particularly with a well-funded campaign setting out the reasons why.

And it would remove the onus from folks like Patrick and Abbott, who could still be comfortably against toll roads in general but make exceptions when the general public overtly supports a given project. For the foreseeable future, it might be the only way to get a large-scale toll road done.

This creates an odd squeeze for GOP toll opponents like Terri Hall, the Comal County-based executive director of Texans for Toll-free Highways. Do you really go into a ballot booth and say, no, people should not have a right to vote on something? The Republican Party, after all, for a long time has been supportive (particularly in other states) of putting large policy questions before voters.

I called Hall to ask her about this, but didn’t hear back.

Of course, this is a nonbinding vote, as I said above. The Legislature, no matter what GOP primary voters say, would still have to pass a law (and get Abbott’s signature) requiring such votes on toll roads.

So I’ll be watching March 6 to see how GOP primary voters come down on Proposition 2. And what happens after they almost certainly give it a big yes.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: funding; gop; infrastructure; managedlanes; primary; prop1; prop7; texas; tollban; tollfatigue; tolls; transportation; vote

1 posted on 04/10/2018 11:11:26 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A novel idea, ask voters. Hey, how about use gas taxes for roads as they were supposed to be used?


2 posted on 04/10/2018 11:13:50 AM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

“A novel idea, ask voters. Hey, how about use gas taxes for roads as they were supposed to be used?”

Yup, not for choo-choo trains and bicycle paths. The gas taxes need to benefit those who paid them.


3 posted on 04/10/2018 11:16:58 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

They should have to vote on every toll road. We shouldn’t be required to pay for roads twice.


4 posted on 04/10/2018 11:17:41 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Toll roads are cash cows for states. When a standard road may take decades and have billions in cost overruns, a toll road can be put in quick and the cash will start to flow in.

Oklahoma said they would make their toll roads free just as soon as the tolls pay for the construction. Many of their toll roads were paid off fifty years ago but are still toll roads because of the revenue generated by them.


5 posted on 04/10/2018 11:57:35 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE

Brilliant.

Two things are handled inn a corrupt manner that has caused contention for decades.

The obvious answer is for obnoxious, wasteful bureaucrats to get political hacks to lobby against parts of the government that have proper oversite.


6 posted on 04/10/2018 12:00:37 PM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE

A few years ago, they spent millions on a dog walk.


7 posted on 04/10/2018 12:12:24 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Ask Dallas about their bike/pedestrian bridge is working out.


8 posted on 04/10/2018 12:19:52 PM PDT by hadaclueonce ( This time I am Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

I would like to see a factual report setting out how much gasoline/diesel tax is collected by state and federal governments and how it is spent both in actual dollars and percentages.

I believe the American people should know before the first dollar of any appropriation is spent for highway/road infrastructure project?


9 posted on 04/10/2018 12:32:02 PM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

How about

1) eliminate gas taxes
2) sell off interstates title and all
3) use money raised to eliminate gov’t debt

If socialism doesn’t work for bread, why would it work for interstates ?


10 posted on 04/10/2018 12:36:05 PM PDT by vooch (America First Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vooch

Wouldn’t your alternative be toll roads? Pay company A to go to the store, company B to the movies, company C to take your kids to school, and dozens of companies to go visit grandma. Seriously?


11 posted on 04/10/2018 12:38:25 PM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vooch; Reno89519

>
How about

1) eliminate gas taxes
2) sell off interstates title and all
3) use money raised to eliminate gov’t debt

If socialism doesn’t work for bread, why would it work for interstates ?
>

Come, now, don’t be so harsh on Socialism.

I mean, it only took ~65yrs. to finalize I-95.


12 posted on 04/10/2018 12:52:50 PM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

The road? No.
The toll? Yes.


13 posted on 04/10/2018 1:20:27 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

What a novel idea of taxation and representation. The toll system is a scam like the lottery.


14 posted on 04/10/2018 2:01:57 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

People sometimes say they like “growth” but often don’t want to pay for it. They don’t want to get stuck with cost-of-living or tax increases TO PAY FOR “growth”. They pretend its great as the property value of their home goes up, until they get the property tax bill that acknowledges the higher value of their place.

Citizens need to admit and say they either want a new highway or not, and quit pretending that one way of getting the money out of their pocket for it is any better or any worse than another - you want it, or you don’t; nothing else matters.

Yes, let citizens vote for any new highway, regardless of how it is to be financed - whether tolls, state general and fuel taxes, whatever, it all comes out of your pockets.


15 posted on 04/10/2018 2:12:48 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

They finished 95?!


16 posted on 04/10/2018 2:13:16 PM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

interstates only


17 posted on 04/10/2018 2:17:22 PM PDT by vooch (America First Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

bump


18 posted on 04/11/2018 4:54:33 AM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson