Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thoughtomator

So some of you think it’s not really happening? Reuter’s and USA Today are wrong? Just want to be clear if it’s Russian origin you dispute or the whole thing.


16 posted on 04/17/2018 8:17:13 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand

At this point, yes, there have been so many cries of “Russian wolf!” that I am at the point where I believe no accusation being made against Russia, especially when it comes from the same people who repeatedly lied to us before.

These people are all about getting Trump at any costs, and that means pushing Hillary’s “Russians-stole-my-election” narrative, no matter how dead that horse may be.


17 posted on 04/17/2018 8:30:35 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: firebrand

I’ll give you the specific detail as to why this particular accusation is not credible.

Note in the article, almost all the quotes - especially the key ones - are from anonymous “officials”.

Of the three people who are actually named, NONE of them make the accusation that the article makes.

So the question is: who are these unnamed US and UK government officials who are making the accusation? I’d wager that they’re all Clintonites or Deep Staters with mischief on their agenda, and this would be obvious if they were named - so they are not named.

Bottom line: to believe this accusation you have to take the word of anonymous government “officials” - the well-known hallmark of fake news.


18 posted on 04/17/2018 8:39:49 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson