Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Trump American history textbook 'blatantly biased,' critics say
fox news ^ | 04/17/2018 | Caleb Parke

Posted on 04/18/2018 7:16:43 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Pearson spokesman, Scott Overland, told Fox News the textbook was “developed by an expert author and underwent rigorous peer review to ensure academic integrity.” He added that it was “designed to convey college-level information to high school students” and “aims to promote debate and critical thinking by presenting multiple sides” of the 2016 election.....
“Most thought that Trump was too extreme a candidate to win the nomination, but his extremism, his anti-establishment rhetoric, and, some said, his not-very-hidden racism connected with a significant number of primary voters,” Fraser wrote.

Trump voters are described as “mostly older, often rural or suburban, and overwhelmingly white” while the book uses the viewpoint of Clinton voters to describe Trump’s supporters as fearful, backwards, sexist people who supported a mentally ill candidate.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Michigan; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: 2020election; 2ndamendment; abortion; academicbias; banglist; brainwashing; bythepeople; education; election2020; genderdysphoria; globalwarminghoax; greennewdeal; homeschool; homosexualagenda; ilhanomar; infanticide; jamescomey; jameswfraser; lisapage; medicareforall; michigan; minnesota; nra; obamacare; pearsoneducation; peterstrzok; rashidatlaib; robertmueller; secondamendment; textbook; textbooks; trump
"Rigorous peer review." Ideological peers, that is. The education racket goes full steam ahead.
1 posted on 04/18/2018 7:16:44 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

I’m surprised they even are going to mention him. At this point they are such liars they might just print the books with Hillary winning.


2 posted on 04/18/2018 7:18:20 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Conservatives need to pay far more attention to textbook bias. Organizations fighting it need to be fully funded.


3 posted on 04/18/2018 7:19:20 AM PDT by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

“...designed to convey college-level information to high school students”

So they admit the bias.


4 posted on 04/18/2018 7:28:44 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

Very true statement....Some of the things going on in public education really outrageous...


5 posted on 04/18/2018 7:30:35 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

That’s ok because MY PUBLIC SCHOOL, the one that I send my children to, would NEVER use an anti-American textbook. It is only THOSE public schools, the ones there, over there, and there - not MY PUBLIC SCHOOL. Oh my, never.

(standard FReeper rationalization for continuing to send their kids to public schools, DESPITE all these reports)


6 posted on 04/18/2018 7:34:19 AM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's...I just don't tell anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

You got it. Pearson is still one of the top textbook publishers too. This kind of bias is mainstream in all textbooks. Anyone who doesn’t read their kids textbooks is lying to themselves about what’s being taught.

PS - Mine never went to public schools but the textbooks were the same.


7 posted on 04/18/2018 7:42:29 AM PDT by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

From your link....

....Tarra Snyder, a student at Rosemount High School in Minnesota, who saw a copy of the book sent to her school, told Fox News she was “appalled” after seeing how “blatantly biased” the newest edition of “By the People: A History of the United States” was toward Trump and his voters. She said it also glossed over all issues then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton faced during her campaign.

“There are specific parts where it goes off the rails from a historical textbook toward an op-ed,” Snyder said..

She told “Fox & Friends” she’s just raising a red flag and bringing attention to what was inside the textbook.

“It was really, really surprising to me,” she said. “I really believe that learning should be objective and that students can make their own decisions based on what they’re able to learn in a classroom, and if the facts are skewed then students aren’t able to make well-rounded decisions on what they believe.”

The textbook – published by British-owned, Pearson Education, and authored by New York University professor James Fraser – is currently being pitched to public high schools in an effort to get them to buy the latest edition.....


Folks need to wake up and make sure this drivel is NOT accepted in their public school districts.


8 posted on 04/18/2018 7:48:21 AM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Problem is, there has been a huge consolidation of the textbook industry in the last 15 or so years. There are now only a few—maybe two or three—publishers. They do publish a couple or so titles for each subject/grade level, but that’s it. 25 years ago I had maybe a dozen texts to choose from for my jr. high history classes. Last time it was three or four—and most were pretty poor. They try to wow you with all of the extra stuff—websites, etc.

The problem could by solved with e-book texts which could open themselves up for competition again.


9 posted on 04/18/2018 9:19:46 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Didn’t Trump get about double the black vote as went to the feckless “My Daddy marched with Martin Luther King” Romney?


10 posted on 04/18/2018 10:17:43 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

“The problem could by solved with e-book texts which could open themselves up for competition again.”

Don’t be so sure of that. The problem with e-books is who controls them. The Texas State Board of Education, whose members are voted in by the public, has usually pushed for books representing a conservative viewpoint (such as respecting the country, teaching phonics, teaching math without calculators) - often making national news. Needless to say, the teachers here, along with the administrators and other Leftists DESPISE having to answer to them (with the one exception of the public schools that I send my kids to...LOL). So the Left came up with CSCOPE, an electronic curriculum which was free of state BOE control and were able to get their hard-left, America-hating, agenda into our schools. If you take it one step further, with e-books, the actual text in the books could be changed REAL-TIME, which is scary as hell. So if the book is on the school Intranet, it can say that Trump sucks prostitutes every night, for example, but when the school hooks up to a home system (i.e., where parents can read it), it will say that Trump is the 45th President of the United States.

I prefer paper - it doesn’t have the ability to morph.


11 posted on 04/18/2018 3:57:39 PM PDT by BobL (I shop at Walmart and eat at McDonald's...I just don't tell anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Most thought that Trump was too extreme a candidate to win the nomination

And the last two Demon-rat candidates were middle of the road? ROTFL

12 posted on 04/18/2018 4:00:51 PM PDT by ssaftler (It's not the "deep state". It's the "odoriferous oligarchy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

What about poor FReepers?


13 posted on 04/24/2019 12:30:24 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

‘What about poor FReepers?’

Fair question, maybe pack up and move to the oil patch where they’re paying guys in the field 200k, at least per an article today. Of course they have to be clean drug-wise, and have a clean enough driving record, but I doubt that’s a problem with FReepers.


14 posted on 04/24/2019 1:11:23 PM PDT by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BobL

What does these jobs involve?


15 posted on 04/25/2019 2:12:33 AM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

There was an article a few days ago about one of the oil companies now averaging 200k for field workers, I think in Texas. I’d expect the work to be physically demanding and in tough conditions [excludes me and most other FReepers, LOL], and include overtime, but younger dudes I’m sure can handle it.

Here is an article regarding barbers making 180k in ND. Lots of money there, but as always, if you want good money, you need to be flexible regarding where to live.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-this-oil-boom-town-even-a-barber-can-make-180-000-11551436210


16 posted on 04/25/2019 11:13:46 AM PDT by BobL (I eat at McDonald's and shop at Walmart - I just don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson