Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Emanuel wins court ruling in sanctuary city lawsuit against Trump administration
Chicago Tribune ^ | April 19, 2018 | John Byrne

Posted on 04/19/2018 3:28:38 PM PDT by Hadean

Mayor Rahm Emanuel called on President Donald Trump’s Justice Department Thursday to hand over grant money to Chicago, after a panel of federal judges said the funds can’t be withheld from so-called sanctuary cities.

The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago upheld a nationwide injunction prohibiting Attorney General Jeff Sessions from requiring cities give immigration agents access to undocumented immigrants in their lock-ups in order to get certain public safety grants.

Emanuel quickly called an afternoon news conference at City Hall to trumpet his latest win in the city’s lawsuit to stop the Trump administration from withholding the money.

“The Trump Justice Department could actually say ‘OK, we’re going to go forward with these grants, and let’s fight the case out in court,’ ” Emanuel said, flanked by a crowd of aldermen and city lawyers. “But they refuse to give municipalities like Chicago and other cities around the country the resources to fight crime and gun violence, because they think fighting us on the principle of being a sanctuary, welcoming city, is more important than helping the police departments get the technology they need to do a better job in public safety.”

And Democratic U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin applauded the court decision, saying Trump’s policy pressured “local communities to join in the president’s mass deportation agenda.”

The judges’ stongly worded ruling stated that America’s Founding Fathers understood a concentration of power “threatens individual liberty” and established the separation of powers as “a bulwark against such tyranny.”

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chicago; sanctuarycity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 04/19/2018 3:28:38 PM PDT by Hadean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Time to replace every federal judge Obama appointed.


2 posted on 04/19/2018 3:30:27 PM PDT by Lumper20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

I need some smart Freeper to point out to me the constitutional mandate for the FedGov to finance local municipal law enforcement.


3 posted on 04/19/2018 3:37:33 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

“The judges’ stongly worded ruling stated that America’s Founding Fathers understood a concentration of power “threatens individual liberty” and established the separation of powers as “a bulwark against such tyranny.”

You must be joking.

So, not sending money to a state that is in rebellion against federal law is...tyranny?

When do they exonerate Jeff Davis?


4 posted on 04/19/2018 3:39:02 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Can’t this be appealed?


5 posted on 04/19/2018 3:42:02 PM PDT by Sons of Union Vets (Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sons of Union Vets

Yes, but now only to the SCOTUS. And there would have to be a dissenting opinion in another circuit court for them to consider it usually.


6 posted on 04/19/2018 3:45:09 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Oh Rahm. The bureaucracy can be slow walked to a very painful degree. You know that, being the architect of one yourself.

I am sure DJT will get that money to you just as fast as it deserves to be delivered


7 posted on 04/19/2018 3:47:27 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

It’s in the same clause with gay marriage and abortion. You must have skipped over it.


8 posted on 04/19/2018 3:49:14 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20
Time to replace every federal judge Obama appointed.

The three judges who decided this case were appointed by Reagan, Ford and George H.W. Bush.

9 posted on 04/19/2018 3:53:59 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
So, not sending money to a state that is in rebellion against federal law is...tyranny?

The basis for the ruling was that Congress appropriated the money without conditions, and Sessions tried to add conditions after the fact. This was held to be a violation of separation of powers. Nothing in the ruling prevents Congress from adding conditions to future appropriations.

10 posted on 04/19/2018 3:56:55 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

The South should have sued Lincoln.


11 posted on 04/19/2018 4:05:51 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (US out of the UN, UN out of the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Arizona


12 posted on 04/19/2018 4:05:52 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Funny,they thought it was just peachy when Obola did it over not allowing transvestites in the little girls room.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/4/north-carolina-transgender-bathroom-bill-feds-thre/

President Obama’s Justice Department on Wednesday threatened to pull federal education dollars from North Carolina if the state does not repeal a law prohibiting people from using public restrooms of the opposite sex.

In a letter to Republican Gov. Pat McCrory, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta said the state’s HB2 law violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which bars discrimination on the basis of sex in the workplace, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex in education.

“The Department of Justice has determined that, as a result of compliance with and implementation of NC House Bill2, both you and the state of NC are in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” Ms. Gupta said.

The agency said North Carolina officials have until Monday to address the issue, or the state risks losing millions of dollars in federal education funding.


13 posted on 04/19/2018 4:10:53 PM PDT by sportscaster ("LET'S ROLL")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Slow walk the money. It could take months to years before the funding can be released. Oh pishaw.


14 posted on 04/19/2018 4:11:10 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lumper20

lol. Not happening until they either step down or die. Life time appointments means just that.....FOREVER. I doubt we will see many stepping down for 25 years.


15 posted on 04/19/2018 4:15:40 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

10-4


16 posted on 04/19/2018 4:18:18 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sportscaster; Lurking Libertarian

Yeah, was trying to find that one. Recalled Holder did similar.

Funny how it’s always completely justified when they do it, but “tyranny” when we do.

Wonder if the 7th Circuit would like to weigh in on the actions of their former Senator back then.


17 posted on 04/19/2018 4:26:18 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

Chicago thug, Emanuel, only thinks he has won. He will never see a dime of the money.


18 posted on 04/19/2018 4:39:27 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean
Mayor Rahm Emanuel called on President Donald Trump’s Justice Department Thursday to hand over grant money to Chicago, after a panel of federal judges said the funds can’t be withheld from so-called sanctuary cities.

Federal judges say or demand that the funds be paid. But the panel of federal judges do not control the budget.

If the amount of funds can be re-allocated, or set aside to accommodate other accounting priorities, then the amount of grant money can be locked up or reduced to near zero.

Is this not true?

19 posted on 04/19/2018 4:42:35 PM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hadean

The Founding Fathers would be aghast at the whole grant process. Rahm would have been tarred and feathered long ago.


20 posted on 04/19/2018 4:42:39 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning #covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson