Posted on 04/19/2018 10:02:43 PM PDT by astrat7
When did this happen? I think she revealed something she should not have?
Now watch her try to walk that statement back, if it’s followed up at all. She’ll say “I was so tired last Thursday, I misheard the question. I DO apologize for any confusion.
I need to go back to drinking coffee in the morning, yes I do!”
Big ERROR.
Pelosi admits travel to North Korea [past].
Archive immediately.
They have tried to ‘cover’ this.
Why is this relevant?
https://www.c-span.org/video/?444272-1/democrats-back-farm-bill-leader-pelosi
These people will lose everything.
Q
Q posted this tonight with a link to a Q&A with Pelosi and the press. I believe the Q&A was from today. It has since been removed from the link, but I did have a chance to view the video before it was taken down. Pelosi did indeed acknowledge visiting Pyongyang as part of some past Congressional delegation.
We live in interesting times.
~W
Partial transcript:
“Pelosi said her concerns about the North’s proliferation deepened after a trip to the North many years ago.
“When we went to Pyongyang, and we talked about missiles, we talked about MIAs and POWs, we talked about home, we talked about a number of subjects. But about the missiles, because the development of missiles was a national security issue of concern,” Pelosi said.
“They said, ‘Look, we just make these to sell. You want to buy them? We’ll sell them to you,’” she said. “
My bad. I guess the video’s back. Go to 13:00 mark for the relevant comments.
Indeed.
Who says Kim doesn’t have a sense of humor?
Sounds like Democrats were colluding with the North Koreans.
Video is still up, I just watched it ~10 min ago.
Was this BEFORE or AFTER the Clintons gave NK, what, 4 billions dollars supposedly to help them increase their energy capacities?
We know she visited Damascus in 2007 to suck up to Assad and undermine the Bush admin. Funny how the MSM dropped that into the memory hole, too.
Bill Richardson (big Clinton Democrap) made a bunch of trips to Pyongyang, that was known all along. She may well have been in one of those contingents. Democraps have long been conducting their own foreign policy.
I doubt that a Pelosi visit to Pyongyang is going to matter unless we get real dirt on something being said that we don’t already know. The fact that N. Korea sells their missiles is not news.
Q group is saying Pelosi is toast for revealing her trip to NK and for revealing highest level of intel to press.
The intel was that NK is not a concern as to WHAT they would do with nuke weapons but WHO they would sell them to. NK is a proliferator, will sell nukes to anyone for money. Pelosi said her trip to NK, they said they would sell them to her, to anyone for money.
Q instructed to archive her press conference offline as there is already an effort to scrub it.
My take: Pelosi is trying to discount Trump’s coming achievement with NK by casting it as a big nothing compared to their proliferation.
Next, I recall the suggestion that rogue CIA actors were behind NK and their nuke rattling, that Kim Jong was playing stooge to deep state. Sounds farfetched but maybe not. If it’s true, then Pelosi’s disclosure may be a warning that NK may sell nukes to others (ISIS?) that will erase Trump’s achievement.
Pretty evil thoughts behind this line of analysis.
Next, earlier in the year, Petraeus (who is a democrat compromised and controlled actor) was an invitee at a talk in Manhattan where he played up war with NK as if it was a certainty. The talk was videotaped and it could be seen that Petraeus was bizarrely seen to almost be praying that war would break out with NK. How is this relevant?
War is a business. It’s a diversion. It’s a news headline grabber. It dominates a news cycle.
If war were to break out with NK, would it mean the deep state bad actors could escape through distraction?
Was Pelosi signaling that if Trump were to neutralize NK, another regime or group would be found to take its place?
Q indicated deep state cabal would not get away with it. Q commented that Pelosi’s press conference would be her undoing. I take it to mean the cabal will not get away with what they are doing, war or no war.
Yes, Kim was emboldened to proceed with nuclear tests after Pelosi visited. She also visited Assad and had the same effect. God help us if she becomes speaker again.
Couldn’t they just have kept her? She’s as powermad as Rocket Man, only she lacks the AA Guns with which to shoot Republicans.
was it in 2006?
I think her dementia is advancing. It’s surprising to me that she’s still respected by the news media, and dragged into interviews.
Q is careless and ignorant. Pelosi’s comment references missile technology, not nukes. It has been no secret since the 1990s that North Korea will sell missiles and missile technology if they can, and Myanmar and Iran are certainly known to have purchased. What Pelosi said does not sound the least bit classified, it is common knowledge, in the open, among people who follow these issues. Not classified, though of course there would be many reports and details that are classified. But Pelosi does not reference any details or reports.
Would they also sell nukes to just about anyone??? Maybe, but that is NOT what Pelosi’s comment is about. It IS another reason to insist that they end their nuclear weapons programs, of course. But Pelosi’s comment on the video is about missiles, not nukes, and it is not news.
In other words, just "crumbs"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.