Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why More Taxpayer Funding to Elon Musk’s Big F-ing Rocket Would Be a Big F-ing Mistake
Townhall.com ^ | April 21, 2018 | Beau Rothschild

Posted on 04/21/2018 9:13:50 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 04/21/2018 9:13:50 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not a big fan of Musk in other ways. Big fan of what his rockets can do.


2 posted on 04/21/2018 9:17:13 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

please....

Go SpaceX!


3 posted on 04/21/2018 9:18:20 AM PDT by mowowie (uire lab;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Why would anyone give any credence to such a foul worded sophmoric article.


4 posted on 04/21/2018 9:21:08 AM PDT by MCF (If my home can't be my Castle, then it will be my Alamo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Lets see who gets to Mars first, Musk or NASA.


5 posted on 04/21/2018 9:21:10 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MCF

Yea the article was ridiculous.


6 posted on 04/21/2018 9:23:25 AM PDT by mowowie (uire lab;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

You mean F-ing Ridiculous.


7 posted on 04/21/2018 9:24:00 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marron

You know something?
The guy is a visionary and a genius. I have ZERO problem giving him tax dollars over ANY government agency to try to do the same.....and probably at 1/10th the cost.


8 posted on 04/21/2018 9:26:14 AM PDT by mowowie (uire lab;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Wow— these clowns don’t know diddly about “apace.”

“Congress pumps pork money to NASA in omnibus budget”
March 22, 2018
Robert Zimmerman

“The omnibus budget that Congress plans to pass this week for 2018 gives NASA $20.7 billion, significantly more than requested and funding almost every pork project Congress could conceive of, including a second mobile launcher for SLS.”
The budget gives SLS and Orion more than $3 billion, funds all the Earth science and education projects the Trump administration wished to cut, as well as WFIRST, which the Trump administration wants to cancel because of cost overruns. In general, the NASA budget is a microcosm of the entire spending bill, which does nothing to cut any program anywhere, including Obamacare and a number of liberal programs that the Republicans have repeatedly promised to shut down, until they are in a position to do so. Then they act like leftist Democrats and fund everything.”


9 posted on 04/21/2018 9:26:45 AM PDT by Voption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

LOL
Musk also has a great sense of humor.

I’d take one Musk over ten Doctor evil’s....(bezos)


10 posted on 04/21/2018 9:28:11 AM PDT by mowowie (uire lab;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Too disrespectful of his dad!


11 posted on 04/21/2018 9:36:21 AM PDT by suekas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This guy is an idiot. $70 mil to NASA is nothing, they blow that much on a toilet seat.

What Musk has done with SpaceX on a shoestring budget is nothing short of miraculous.


12 posted on 04/21/2018 9:38:30 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
Although already receiving over $70 million in government funding for the BFR, SpaceX announced it wants more appropriations to help it power through to the finish line.
The rectum who wrote this is obviously in the bag for someone, or on the take. Just a single LAUNCH of the Delta IV Heavy -- which has half the payload capacity of SpaceX' Falcon Heavy -- is $350 million, and basically every dime for its development (and all of the costs of most of its launches) has come straight from taxpayers.

The Falcon 9, on which the Falcon Heavy is based, was developed for around three times that figure, most of that money coming from Musk or other private backers, and the result has been a cheap, reliable launcher that continues to drop in price. The author of the piece is just a rectum. Oh, and he's a rectum. Even Town Scrawl should be too ashamed to print such garbage. Thanks Kaslin.

13 posted on 04/21/2018 9:38:48 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My proposal is 100,000 Testes D size model rocket engines wrapped with duct tape. And it would create jobs.


14 posted on 04/21/2018 9:44:08 AM PDT by TheNext
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

Ah the good old days.
back then we would glue the fins right onto the engine....forget the costly rocket.
Little aimable missiles to launch at whatever we wanted....

speaking of childhood i read that Cox does not exist anymore.
Had so much fun with there .049 engines back in the day...


15 posted on 04/21/2018 9:50:29 AM PDT by mowowie (uire lab;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Elon Musk is first and foremost a con man. With the willing connivance of the turd's administration he stole hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars for the promise of something that would never work and he and the turd both was fully aware that it would never work (practical electric vehicle)

Rather than giving him any more taxpayer money, his assets should be seized and auctioned to pay back at least a fraction of what was already squandered.

16 posted on 04/21/2018 9:51:39 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

SpaceX is a scam like the perpetual Vehicle car of past time. Acknowledge the current design problems, use the tests for publicity, then switch to a NEW design with NEW funding.

Sucker the funders or the Govt deep pockets.

Additionally, Elon Musk bans older workers, illegal yes, but he keeps the younger naive gullible workers to not question the scam. Your retirement tax money at work, scamming.


17 posted on 04/21/2018 9:52:16 AM PDT by TheNext
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

Yes, a relative was the Cox engineer testing their engines. I wish they had better sound mufflers though.


18 posted on 04/21/2018 9:55:16 AM PDT by TheNext
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Not only did the Falcon Heavy’s core rocket booster crash into the ocean on its inaugural launch...

Two years ago landing a single Falcon 9 first stage was the greatest thing since Buck Rogers. Now, landing two out of three stages simultaneously in a brand new configuration is a giant failure?

The SLS system, run by NASA, was not mentioned in the article. How are they at spending taxpayer money?

NASA wants to waste tens of billions on SLS despite proven SpaceX Falcon Heavy

It seems NASA is much better at wasting taxpayer money than SpaceX is.

19 posted on 04/21/2018 9:56:08 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

yea ok..


20 posted on 04/21/2018 9:59:13 AM PDT by mowowie (uire lab;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson