Snoops is two fat liberals, sitting on a couch, who have zero training in any kind of formal research, carrying out their liberal agenda in any and every way they can.
Calling them a hoax is untrue, they are bold faced political propagandists and liars.
Snoops does not put out the objective truth, they push the subjective truth that always manages to support the liberal/socialist viewpoint and agenda.
This time they have been caught a a bold faced lie.
Snopes is about as authoritative as asking a pet animal what they think
A couple and a Cat is who they were, how people still see them and quote them as a reliable source is beyond me...
Unconstitutional. Whatever California wants to call it, it violates the first amendment to two ways.
They seek to normalize their behavior to achieve easier access to MOLEST YOUR CHILDREN!
This law would ban RAPE THERAPY!!!!!!
>http://www.patheos.com/blogs/warrenthrockmorton/2009/06/05/a-major-study-of-child-abuse-and-homosexuality-revisited/<
On page 37, the other relevant result relates to men.
The 13th research question addressed, of homosexual men who have been molested, what percentage were molested before self-identification as homosexual men, and what percentage were molested after self-identification as homosexual? Of homosexual men who were molested, 68% were molested before self-identification as homosexual, and 32% were molested after self-identification as homosexual.
Snopes is not reliable period.
The California bill is an ABOMINATION.
.
Snopes has never offered truth nor fact.
They are all about destroying truth.
.
Wouldnt it be easy to test by going to a mosque and confessing to the Imam thay you are homosexual and Record his answers as he quotes from the hadith and koran then Demand criminal prosecution very publicly
This is like my state’s gay “marriage” bill. In the first version, to protect “religious freedom” it granted an “exemption” for churches not to have to perform gay weddings, but to qualify for the exemption (1) the marriage had to be between two members of the congregation, and (2) the church could not be open to the public in its religious services, but all services could only be attended by members. In other words, if you ran ads inviting people to services, or even if your congregation members gave cards away inviting people to say Easter or Christmas, that made you a “public accommodation” and you would have to follow all the anti-discrimination laws, including allowing gay weddings. That one was beyond even the ACLU and so they watered it down in the final version (you don’t have to allow gay weddings in your church unless it is public available for weddings for a fee, but it still shows how far they will go if you let them.
Isn’t it strange that “gay conversion” is not illegal when it comes to converting children to gays in government schools.
I suspect we are at war for the foundation of our nation and in the end much blood will flow. Perhaps it is not wise to wait till we are all riding to a place of “safety” in train cars before we discuss rebellion from judicial tyrany.
Snopes is a sneaky liar ,,,,,,,
How long has it taken to discover Snopes never lets facts get in the way of the liberal agenda . Second clue ,,, Fact Check is also very loose with the facts .
Lefties and their minions consider it their chief work to ban The Bible.
Satan, Prince of this world has been given power, but he is defeated.