Skip to comments.New York Times Features Porn Business Story on Front Page
Posted on 05/05/2018 1:58:25 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
Way back in the Dark Ages of the Twentieth Century, if one wanted to read news about the pornography industry, he had to get a copy of Al Goldstein's Screw magazine. However, since we now live in a much more enlightened era, one merely has to check the front page of the New York Times to find the same type of information. Such a story happened on May 5 when the New York Times published on its front page, Who Gets to Be Sexy? It is a detailed look at the current state of the porn business but since it is appearing in a liberal publication, the view is from a feminist perspective.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
If this is supposed to be some kind of “virtue signalling” I am really confused.
Obvious attempt to legitimize Stormy Daniels.
Seeing as how a woman can “revoke consent” the next day, or a wife can run off with her new boyfriend and still get half of the husband’s pension, the business of porn should be front-page news.
There is no low low enough for progressives.
And who better to find new depths of slime than a progressive journalist?
Well since liberal MSM churnalists are simply “fluffers” for the Democrats, it figures that they would be interested in the “sex worker” industry.
the NY Slimes is the same left wing trash who excoriated woman who would go toe Jets games and flash their boobs at halftime in a certain stairwell- which became a long standing tradition until they ruined it..
The article goes on and on. If they don’t kill you with progressivism, they kill you with boredom.
My thoughts too.
Its easier to sympathize with Ms. Clifford if folks can be convinced shes not a sperm dumpster...
The past few years have shown a glimmer of whats possible in porn. Now, as Ms. Hearts said, were just waiting for these old white men to die off.
...and there you go.
Did you read to the last sentence? “Now, as Ms. Hearts said, were just waiting for these old white men to die off.
Oprah also said something like that a few years ago.
And Tom Hayden. His wikipedia page quotes him saying:
[it is] “another step in a long-term goal of mine: the peaceful, nonviolent disappearance of the white race.”
People who will never make any money in porn.
No red-blooded American male will ever jerk off to photos of a 300 pound, one-legged, 57-year old tranny with face tattoos. Thank God for Russian babes.
Go take a look at the porn "beauties" profiled in the NYT article. Not exactly wank material.
Jiz Lee? Really?!
CBS 60 Minutes Porn in the USA https://www.cbsnews.com/video/porn-in-the-usa-2/
Pretty good summary. Porn was a bigger sector in the late cable tv business, subsidizing much other non porn content. Fortune 500 Corporations have a red light sector with regular sex worker employees.
Questions can be asked whether or not the 500 are subsidizing the sex work legalization political agitations.
Well Tom did his part by passing away just before the 2016 election. Probably went to his grave thinking H has it in the bag. Satan probably greeted him with the news of Trump winning. Tom shocked could only utter Trump won!? What fresh hell is this?
Should be "Jiz-free Lee."
There won't be any Jizz flying in the air looking at these pics. Seriously, WTF is that? Happy sock not needed.
Good grief. Remember when porn chicks were hot?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.