Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
The population not in the labor force — they don't have jobs and aren't looking — has climbed a stunning 25.3 million over those years.

Why is this a "stunning" figure? The population not in the labor force includes tens of millions of retirees. That population is growing simply as a matter of course, as Baby Boomers retire and exit the work force permanently.

This is why the labor participation rate is one of the most useless figures published by the U.S. Department of Labor.

11 posted on 05/07/2018 8:29:00 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

RE: Why is this a “stunning” figure? The population not in the labor force includes tens of millions of retirees.

We really should not be counting retirees. I’d like to know if they have a statistic that filters those who are retired out of the picture. THAT will give us a true indicator of those who are actively looking for work and not finding it ( i.e., how dire or how good the job market is ).


14 posted on 05/07/2018 8:31:19 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson