Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Connecticut is throwing away their leverage IMHO. 7 changed EVs would have changed the 2000 election.

But with this plan all candidates need to do is focus on population centers.

1 posted on 05/07/2018 8:29:42 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: where's_the_Outrage?

Voter fraud in Cali should mean its a democrat anyway.


2 posted on 05/07/2018 8:32:28 AM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

So, in 2020 they’ll go to Trump...................


3 posted on 05/07/2018 8:32:58 AM PDT by Red Badger (Remember all the great work Obama did for the black community?.............. Me neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

This law will only be in force until it requires them to allocate the EVs to a republican.


4 posted on 05/07/2018 8:33:02 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~u/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

This will wind up in Supreme Court.


5 posted on 05/07/2018 8:33:28 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

So, basically, CT is giving its electoral votes to CA and NY.


6 posted on 05/07/2018 8:33:34 AM PDT by rbg81 (Truth is stranger than fiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

That sounds unconstitutional; they are disenfranchising their own voters.


7 posted on 05/07/2018 8:33:55 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Does the Constitution allow this?


8 posted on 05/07/2018 8:34:14 AM PDT by IC Ken (Stop making stupid people famous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The RATs have figured out that they can’t “import illegal aliens to vote for them,” so they’re trying now to bastardize the Electoral College to try and subvert the country. This is simply a method by which they disenfranchise their own voters who aren’t RATs.


9 posted on 05/07/2018 8:34:20 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Is this even Constitutional?

The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Explanation It has been enacted into law in 11 states with 165 electoral votes (CA, DC, HI, IL, MA, MD, NJ, NY, RI, VT, WA). https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/


10 posted on 05/07/2018 8:34:34 AM PDT by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The odds are Connecticut will someday be forced to give their Electoral College votes to a Republican after their citizens vote Democrat.

Delicious stupidity.


11 posted on 05/07/2018 8:34:38 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (A Second Amendment march to deny leftists their First Amendment rights. Turnabout is fair play.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
7 changed EVs would have changed the 2000 election.

I thought Connecticut voted for Gore in 2000 anyway. But your point is correct. The State is giving up its right to voice against the sum of other states that out populate it. Stupid is as stupid does.

12 posted on 05/07/2018 8:34:55 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I’m embarrassed to live in Connecticut. It truly is the “Nutball” State.


13 posted on 05/07/2018 8:35:14 AM PDT by ProudDeplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

So all of these states will ignore the will of their own people in favor or NY and CA voters.


14 posted on 05/07/2018 8:35:51 AM PDT by LIConFem (I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

A corrupt state deeds its soul and its future to the corrupt party. It “proudly” converts itself into a “one party” entity, soon to enjoy all the pleasures it deserves.


15 posted on 05/07/2018 8:36:01 AM PDT by CaptainAmiigaf (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

This will last until the first time CT votes opposite the national vote.

Going to kill them in 2020, when their electoral votes have to go to Trump even though the state electorate voted for whoever the D was.

Stupidity of the left cannot be exaggerated.


16 posted on 05/07/2018 8:36:13 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Is this legal? Its obvious intent is to circumvent the founders’ reason for establishing the Electoral College.


18 posted on 05/07/2018 8:37:35 AM PDT by luvbach1 (I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Article IV Section 4: "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government"

If the government of Connecticut vitiates the Connecticut voters' selections for President and Vice President, and instead substitutes the voters' selections from other States, then the State is NOT being given a Republican form of government.

It is therefore incumbent upon the United States to overrule this violation of the U. S. Constitution, and guarantee Connecticut a true Republican form of government.

21 posted on 05/07/2018 8:39:12 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
They should just pass a law that says they will give the electoral votes to the DEM, no matter what. It would be constitutional, and would save the expense of a popular vote.

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress

22 posted on 05/07/2018 8:39:32 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

If every state passed this same law, every election would be a 100% electoral college landslide. In other words, the electoral college would be rendered meaningless, which is probably the goal of this sort of legislation. It is an effort to subvert the Constitution via the back door.


23 posted on 05/07/2018 8:39:47 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Imagine going to popular vote and having a recount. How long did it take to sort out Florida?


26 posted on 05/07/2018 8:41:18 AM PDT by getitright (Finally- a president who offers hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson