Seems there are many valid points in the arguments against the ban. But, I ain't a lawyer and didn't sleep at a holiday in express last night but it appears pretty clear to me. For myself, I don't need a bump stock but am not bothered by someone else having one. Just like a suppressor. I'd like to get one and use it. But, my choice. Keep reading......
1 posted on
05/16/2018 7:46:00 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
2 posted on
05/16/2018 7:46:16 AM PDT by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: rktman
Yes. It is an extra-constitutional ban of a legal product that is similar in nature to an “iran-deal” pile of garbage.
I don’t care if “our” guy did it or not!
3 posted on
05/16/2018 7:50:21 AM PDT by
The Toll
To: rktman
Where is ATF mentioned in the 2nd Amendment?
Is the ATF some radical, violent hate group?
4 posted on
05/16/2018 8:07:05 AM PDT by
TheNext
To: rktman
Seems like they want to invalidate basic laws of physics.
5 posted on
05/16/2018 8:25:36 AM PDT by
GMMC0987
To: rktman
The bump stock ban, so called, is meaningless gun grabber feel-good crapola, like so much of the anti-Second Amendment legislation.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson