Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben Carson strikes critical blow to Obama fair-housing rule...
washingtonexaminer ^ | 5/19/2018 | by Joseph Lawler

Posted on 05/19/2018 1:09:20 PM PDT by caww

The agency, led by Ben Carson, announced Friday evening that it was withdrawing the assessment tool by which cities and counties are supposed to identify housing discrimination and other problems faced by minorities and other groups.

Conservative critics, including Carson, have argued that it represents an unwarranted intrusion of federal government influence into local zoning matters.

The Obama version of the rule would have required cities and counties to use the tool, and data provided by the federal government, to spell out exactly which kinds of disparities their citizens faced. For example, if minorities lived in areas that lack public transit and other services, that would be identified as a problem to be fixed. If the government failed to lay out a plan to address that problem, through re-zoning, transit, or other means, it could, in theory, face the loss of HUD funds.

Shortly after the rule was introduced, Carson derided it as "government-engineered attempts to legislate racial equality.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bencarson; housing; hud; maga; obamalegacy; trumphud; winning
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 05/19/2018 1:09:20 PM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: caww

Winning!


2 posted on 05/19/2018 1:12:38 PM PDT by KevinB (I do not care for that Obama fellow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

This is a really big deal.

It stops the whole federal government control over who you *must* live with idiocy.

We should eliminate HUD entirely.


3 posted on 05/19/2018 1:15:58 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

Tenth Amendment

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.


4 posted on 05/19/2018 1:17:08 PM PDT by gasport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: caww

Obama’s phone and pen gets forcibly stuck up his butt again.


5 posted on 05/19/2018 1:20:11 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

bammy was well on the way to declaring suburbs racist, and to forcing them to take inner city people and give them housing and everything else free.


6 posted on 05/19/2018 1:25:56 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Leftism is an elaborate system for hiding shame behind a cheap mash of virtue. -Klavan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Good for him!


7 posted on 05/19/2018 1:26:51 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

YEs!!!


8 posted on 05/19/2018 1:27:40 PM PDT by Pride in the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinB

I can’t keep track of all the winning, but I’m still not tired of it.


9 posted on 05/19/2018 1:29:26 PM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Yep. This is huge

Reverses one of Obama’s most devious measures. One that would have all but eliminated livable neighborhoods while destroying property values.


10 posted on 05/19/2018 1:29:38 PM PDT by KyCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

A whole bunch of swamp creatures are screaming in agony...a clue the administration hit the target.


11 posted on 05/19/2018 1:39:20 PM PDT by cgbg (Hidden behind the social justice warrior mask is corruption and sexual deviance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: caww
For example, if minorities lived in areas that lack public transit and other services, that would be identified as a problem to be fixed.

Whites, of course, do not matter. If they have those services, or not, is irrelevant, and does not need to be of any concern... because the Left is not racist. SMH

12 posted on 05/19/2018 1:41:42 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

If these fair housing laws were being applied “fairly” - i.e. to liberal and conservative districts alike, why is so much blue state real estate in the stratosphere? I suspect HUD bureaucrats are being a tad selective as to whose ox gets gored:


http://nlihc.org/article/hud-and-doj-update-fair-housing-act-guidance-about-land-use-laws
http://nlihc.org/article/hud-and-doj-update-fair-housing-act-guidance-about-land-use-laws
Prohibiting or restricting the development of housing based on the belief that the residents have a particular protected characteristic, such as race, disability, or family status. An example of such a restriction is a moratorium on the development of multifamily housing because of concerns that residents will include those with a particular protected characteristic.

A land use or zoning practice can result in an unjustified discriminatory effect if it caused or predictably will cause a disparate impact on a group of persons, or if it creates, increases, reinforces, or perpetuates segregated housing patterns because of a protected characteristic. Examples include minimum floor space or lot size requirements that do not have a legally sufficient justification and that increase the size and cost of housing, if such an increase has the effect of excluding persons from a locality or neighborhood because they have protected characteristics. Similarly, prohibiting low income or multifamily housing may have a discriminatory effect on persons because of their protected characteristics, and if so, would violate the Fair Housing Act, absent a legally sufficient justification.


13 posted on 05/19/2018 1:43:46 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Journalism is about covering important stories. With a pillow, until they stop moving.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

This was a big one. Every zip code was going to be evaluated for disparities and racial inequality.


14 posted on 05/19/2018 1:49:08 PM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftists today are speaking as if they plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Dismantling Otraitor’s legacy piece by piece. Gotta love it.

What can be done by Executive Order can be undone by Executive Order. Same same judicial fiat.


15 posted on 05/19/2018 1:50:18 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

Yes, with a Commie govt, I wouldn’t put it past them to say, “Oh, we notice you have 3 spare bedrooms - welcome your new boarders from Somalia!”


16 posted on 05/19/2018 1:50:31 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: caww
Bravo, Doctor! He has been doing a really good job. No fuss, no muss, just draining the swamp.
 
17 posted on 05/19/2018 1:54:21 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (MAGA in the mornin', MAGA in the evenin', MAGA at suppertime . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

More Odumbo era communist Bullshit bites the dust.


18 posted on 05/19/2018 2:18:53 PM PDT by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Is this the rule that allowed them to build low-income housing wherever they wanted - so they could implant ‘refugees’ all over the country?


19 posted on 05/19/2018 2:33:11 PM PDT by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing Obamacare is worse than Obamacare itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

this is a REALLY big deal, and is the kind of thing that awakened masses of new voters and MANY Dems to finally say ENOUGH IS ENOUGH and vote for Donald Trump.

This is yet ANOTHER big campaign promise being kept: getting the Feds the hell out of your neighborhood!


20 posted on 05/19/2018 2:38:26 PM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson