I don’t know much about the investigation -
the question is, WHY don’t we know much about the investigation?
Dead?
Something has always smelled bad about this event.
Clearly more going on that the government wants us to know about. Bet they knew about this guy, had associations with him, and know there are more people involved. Won’t be surprised to hear connection to Islamic terrorists at some point. The real question is how long do we have to wait to hear what really happened?
If it’s from the FBI
it almost certainly is a lie.
Didn’t click on the link.....
Were the women dead or alive?
ISIS is actually usually truthful when they claim someone was working with them. I read somewhere that the FBI verifies each claim independently, and found that that about 95% of the time when ISIS claims some attack was in their name, it can be independently verified to be true.
This is a massive cover-up. That’s plain on the face of it.
Historically, as soon as they have their hands on a perp’s laptop, bank records, phone records, email, and internet search history, which takes all of about an hour, they know exactly who he was and what he was about. Months after 600 people were shot they are still hiding whatever it is they know.
My money is, there is a much bigger story here and they are willing to go down kicking and screaming before they reveal it. There is a major, career-ending, life-ending story here and they already know what it is.
The “bumpstock” lie has been blatantly obvious from the moment the audio was released.
Stephen Paddock’s room records show three women registered in his room
May 27, 2018
Was this guy a deep state asset that went rogue?
My guess is that these women saw something, said something and FBI/LVMPD did nothing. They are embarrassed. See the Parkland Florida shooting.
FBI is not only corrupt it’s incompetent.
Who are the women?
We’ve seen one room service receipt for him and one woman. Bet there are more. This whole thing stunk to high heaven from day one.
blog
So what he had a few prostitutes in his room. No big deal.
I doubt that's true.
Everyone leaves a digital footprint and there would be information in his home about any number of mundane topics that would offer leads (bank records, purchases on and off line, etc).
Paddock didn't scrub his past. Law enforcement did it for him.
The question is why.
This massacre demonstrates how we are not even close to governing ourselves. We the People should know everything there is to know about this heinous crime, and if we don’t, we need to SCREAM WHY.
The only reason that makes logical sense is that there is a usurping power over us who attempts to pacify us by omitting this information.
So, do we have rights that we aren’t rising up to TAKE? Or are we serfs with no rights except on an old piece of goat skin under glass?
It does not say there are three women in Paddock’s room.
It is a dispatch log. That particular portion is describing locations of police, victims, employees and suspects. It could very well be that the blacked out text contains the room number of the three females. The entire log is available
https://files.acrobat.com/a/preview/51a4c2da-15ed-473d-8cf3-ab50062f06e2
Did they perhaps enter Paddock's room afterwards?
Were they instead in the second hotel room associated with Paddock?
According to this source, Paddock began shooting at 10:05PM Las Vegas time.
The females documented in the room, according to Loomer, are cited in a report which apparently shows 11:02PM.
Still lots of ambiguity.
I would think that anyone in Paddock's physical company and room who was present during the shooting would be exhaustively interviewed. So if that's the case LVMPD, let's see those interview transcripts—or at least a decent summary of them.
Frankly, I have no idea what to think about the Mandalay Bay attack as yet. There's still entirely too much fog...