Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun groups want a restraining order against Deerfield's assault weapons ban before..
chicagotribune.com ^ | June 1, 2018 | Karen Berkowitz

Posted on 06/03/2018 8:18:16 AM PDT by PROCON

Full Title: Gun groups want a restraining order against Deerfield's assault weapons ban before it takes effect in 2 weeks

Gun-rights advocacy groups are asking a Lake County Circuit Court judge to bar the village of Deerfield from enforcing its ban on assault weapons that is set to kick in June 13.

The ordinance enacted April 2 by the Deerfield Village Board gives residents until June 13 to turn in any guns that fit the village’s definition of assault weapons, remove them from the village or modify the guns so they’re no longer considered assault weapons. The ordinance empowers the town’s police chief to confiscate the assault weapons of anyone charged under the ordinance.

Owners found in violation can be fined up to $1,000 a day, according to the ordinance.

Two lawsuits were filed in April challenging the ordinance on various grounds, including a claim that the ordinance deprives gun owners of property they are legally entitled to possess. The plaintiffs in both lawsuits are asking for a temporary restraining order to block Deerfield from enforcing the ban until the court can hear their arguments for a permanent injunction.

A hearing to consider the restraining order motions is set for June 8, just days before the ban is set to take effect.

“The fast-approaching compliance date compels plaintiffs to seek more immediate and intermediate relief until this matter can be fully heard on the merits,” said attorney David Sigale in a petition on behalf of Deerfield gun owner Daniel Easterday, the Illinois State Rifle Association and the Second Amendment Foundation.

Sigale’s petition notes that Deerfield residents in possession of the those weapons face prosecution, confiscation and destruction of their property and hefty monetary fines.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: ar15; assaultweapon; banglist; deerfield; gunban; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Predictions on the outcome?

Is it time for SCOTUS to become involved in this important Constitutional issue?

1 posted on 06/03/2018 8:18:16 AM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PROCON; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...

RKBA Ping List


This Ping List is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.

More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.

2 posted on 06/03/2018 8:18:54 AM PDT by PROCON ('Progressive' is a Euphemism for Totalitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Good luck enforcing it.


3 posted on 06/03/2018 8:19:44 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=600>https://i.imgur.com/zXSEP5Z.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If the ordinance survives, Deerfield will become a microcosm of what happens with a national ‘assault’ weapons ban.


4 posted on 06/03/2018 8:29:58 AM PDT by PROCON ('Progressive' is a Euphemism for Totalitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
From the article:

The ordinance empowers the town’s police chief to confiscate the assault weapons of anyone charged under the ordinance. Owners found in violation can be fined up to $1,000 a day, according to the ordinance.

It would be cheaper and infinitely more effective to string the ba$tard$ up.

5 posted on 06/03/2018 8:35:34 AM PDT by BlackbirdSST (Apparently I voted demoncrat for 40 years. They all wore 'R' jerseys! 'R'atpublicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

[[or modify the guns so they’re no longer considered assault weapons.]]

And just what exactly would that entail? Nothing on the guns make them into a true fully automatic assault weapon

[[Owners found in violation can be fined up to $1,000 a day, according to the ordinance.]]

And here we have the real reason for the ban- money money money- as well as turning law abiding citizens into felons who can never own a gun of any kind again in their life if they are caught with an ‘assault’ weapon


6 posted on 06/03/2018 8:40:04 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
Deerfield Village Board is working hard to make defenseless victims of ALL residents of Deerfield. The Deerfield Village Board should be impeached and removed, immediately.

It is a sad irony that the ones on this 'board' would not be the first victims of their devilish antiConstitution foolery. Where is MS13 when they could be useful?

7 posted on 06/03/2018 8:40:22 AM PDT by MHGinTN (A dispensational perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

“Is it time for SCOTUS to become involved in this important Constitutional issue?”

I believe we need to endure the local assaults on the 2nd and hope we get another SC pick. I do not want THIS SC to hear any of these. The last 2nd case that went the SC went 5-4 and Kennedy was VERY wobbly. We could easily lose the 2nd in this atmosphere.


8 posted on 06/03/2018 8:40:28 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Good luck enforcing it.”

Seems to me that unless Illinois is different than most states, it should have a preemption law with respect to firearms that would obviate this town’s ability to promulgate and enforce this nutball “law.”


9 posted on 06/03/2018 8:44:24 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

10 posted on 06/03/2018 8:46:10 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

“If the ordinance survives, Deerfield will become a microcosm of what happens with a national ‘assault’ weapons ban.”

NYC Philly Chicago Denver LA...All places the inmates are running the Asylums.....


11 posted on 06/03/2018 8:46:44 AM PDT by litehaus (A memory toooo long.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Definition of an assault weapon is????


12 posted on 06/03/2018 8:48:42 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litehaus

——NYC Philly Chicago Denver LA...All places the inmates are running the Asylums-—

My view is that the tyrants are busilly running the tyranny


13 posted on 06/03/2018 8:48:56 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
This is a monumental situation.

I don't think the city council is smart enough to realize this, but if the 'confiscators' are met with deadly force by gun owners as they apply the law, either 2 things happen. 1) The city backs off and reevaluates their decision. 2) If the gun owners acquiesce and turn-in their weapons, immediately other jurisdictions throughout the country will see this surrender by Deerfield gun owners as an invitation to enact the same ordinance in their communities.

This lawsuit is HUGE, stay tuned.

14 posted on 06/03/2018 8:49:12 AM PDT by PROCON ('Progressive' is a Euphemism for Totalitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
Hmm. Any weapon with a salt shaker accessory? There already NOT actual "assault" weapons. So, dear-leader-field, take your 🐂💨💩 ordinance and pound sand.
15 posted on 06/03/2018 8:51:33 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Like they are going to go to the sheriff and turn in their guns! LMAO! I guess when one of them is caught they can pay the $1000 bucks a day! More LMAO!


16 posted on 06/03/2018 8:58:11 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (I'm not tired of Winning yet! Please, continue on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Whatever they want it to be.


17 posted on 06/03/2018 8:59:01 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (I'm not tired of Winning yet! Please, continue on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

I wonder how many live in the wilds of deerfield.


18 posted on 06/03/2018 9:08:22 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Nazism is here alright.


19 posted on 06/03/2018 9:11:00 AM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

I guess rocks then.


20 posted on 06/03/2018 9:12:23 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson