City governments should be SUED for "gay pride" parades

Chalet Reports ^ | 28 January 2018 | Ashton Gray (via David Reznor)

[LevonRiver]

Glorification of Sexual Perversion is War Against Mankind

The traditional family is the core of human existence. Heterosexual relationships and marriages came into existence as the guarantee for the future of mankind. The purpose of sex is procreation, and only heterosexual sex results in procreation. The purpose of sex is not transitory “pleasure;” sex is pleasurable so that its purpose—which is continuation of the race—will take place and mankind can go forward into the future.

Obsessive or fixated focus on sexual “pleasures” that are not heterosexual, practiced to the exclusion of heterosexual activities, are perversions. If you’re offended by the word “perversion,” you’re welcome to stop reading, clutch your pearls, and leave through the same exit door as those who left at the second paragraph of this chapter, but it’s a perfectly correct word in the English language that effectively describes the condition, “perversion” being defined as “any of various means of obtaining sexual gratification that are generally regarded as being abnormal.”

. . . In January 2017, a Gallup poll reported that the total percentage of the U.S. population who said they were lesbian, “gay,” bisexual, or transgender was only 4.1 percent. . . . Those conditions—by statistics, simple math, and fundamental dictionary definitions—are perversions, and that’s how I’m appropriately going to refer to them.

. . . I don’t care, and neither should anybody care, if someone wants to have sex only with rutabagas. That is a “right” they certainly have, and are welcome to, as long as they do it in private and I don’t have to be lectured endlessly about “rutabagaphobia”—through media licensed by a government that is supported by taxes—or have to deal with traffic tied up by a local government using taxes because of a “Rutabaga Partner Pride” parade.

[LevonRiver]

City governments should be sued for every dime lost and spent tying up city streets, and providing security, for a "parade" exclusively promoting perversion. Pro-lifers and religious groups should demand to have floats and presence in all parades, and sue for Conspiracy Against Rights if refused.

[sickoflibs]

RE:”City governments should be sued for every dime lost and spent tying up city streets, and providing security, for a “parade” exclusively promoting perversion. Pro-lifers and religious groups should demand to have floats and presence in all parades, and sue for Conspiracy Against Rights if refused.”

Wouldn't last 5 minutes in court.

Next!

[Rurudyne]

Actually, there is no “right” to engage in homosexual acts.

Homosexuality was generally illegal among all the several States that Ratified the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Therefore engaging in homosexual acts CANNOT be among the Privileges and Immunities in A4:S2:C1 nor can it be among the other rights retained in the 9th Amendment (since being illegal they were clearly not retained at the time).

Homosexual act should never have been legalized.

They should once again be criminalized.

[lee martell]

Good luck with that, whether it’s the logical thing to do or not. Logic and reason matter a lot less these days, compared to the past.

[Lurkinanloomin]

[bert]

[DungeonMaster]

[AppyPappy]

Yeah, because freedom!

[fwdude]

I call them “AIDS Pride” parades, because that is exactly what they are.

Never, EVER let them forget the public health damage they have caused.

[Tea Party Terrorist]

Liberals caused huge social change through decades use of the Courts.

Considering the blunder Reid made, Trump is appointing record numbers of Judges. If the GOP holds the Senate, then he will appoint even more.

[fwdude]

Wouldn't last 5 minutes in court.

With a good legal team, I'd bet that it could last a lot longer than 5 minutes. It would be a good "lawfare" approach, bleeding the cities with perverted councils until they agreed to change. After all, it's what the homo-left does constantly.

[fwdude]

This seems far fetched, but unless we go on the unmistakable offensive, instead of cowering in our own defensive “religious freedom” protection closets, we won’t make any real headway.

[Buckeye McFrog]

I don’t think this would go anywhere. Any group can petition to have a public march or protest, and saying no just gets you tied-up in the thorny thicket of First Amendment litigation.

Once they have a permit security and public safety must be provided. Cities really don’t have an option here.

[MichaelCorleone]

“This seems far fetched, but unless we go on the unmistakable offensive, instead of cowering in our own defensive “religious freedom” protection closets, we won’t make any real headway.”

This can’t be repeated enough.

[fwdude]

If economic/participant feasibility were the deciding factor in my large, relatively conservative big Texas city, the haughtiness parade would have on its own years ago. Here's the sparsely attended nothing-burger from last year.

[Mrs. Don-o]

"...'perversion' being defined as 'any of various means of obtaining sexual gratification that are generally regarded as being abnormal.'"

This is a pretty good article, but his definition of perversion is inadequate. We're living in a generation that 'generally regards' ejaculation down somebody's throat or up their butt or into a baggie or a bit of beef liver as normal.

An objective definition is what's needed. Author Ashton Gray rightly observed that sex is a procreative act. The definition of perversion, objectively, should be sex that departs from the procreative form.