Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seth Rich’s Brother, Obama Lawyers Refuse to Authorize Wikileaks to Release Truth about DNC Server
The Gateway Pundit ^ | June 14, 2018 | Alicia Powe

Posted on 06/14/2018 12:34:45 PM PDT by detective

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
This is a must read article.
1 posted on 06/14/2018 12:34:45 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

Does WikiLeaks need authorization?


2 posted on 06/14/2018 12:36:14 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

“Seth Rich’s Brother, Obama Lawyers Refuse to Authorize Wikileaks to Release Truth about DNC Server”

uh, when did wikileaks have to get permission from some stinking lawyer to release anything? Ever?


3 posted on 06/14/2018 12:36:46 PM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Exactly. Tell these a-holes to go pound sand.


4 posted on 06/14/2018 12:37:16 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: detective

Gee, I wonder why.


5 posted on 06/14/2018 12:38:03 PM PDT by bcr100 (Its)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Does WikiLeaks need authorization?

That's my question too. I thought that was the whole concept behind Wikileaks. I'm sure John Podesta didn't give his permission for his e-mails to be leaked.

6 posted on 06/14/2018 12:38:13 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: detective

Why would Wikileaks care if they had authorization or not? I mean it’s not like they seek the Federal Government’s blessing when they post nation secrets with impunity.


7 posted on 06/14/2018 12:41:03 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
"Does WikiLeaks need authorization?"

Wikileaks has one principal they stand on. Total secrecy on who gives them the info. They protect the source. Their entire platfrom is setup to do just that. So yes they would need official permission to reveal how they got the info.

8 posted on 06/14/2018 12:41:51 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Exactly. Tell these a-holes to go pound sand.

I agree, but Seth Rich’s brother is running the risk of ending up just like Seth did.

9 posted on 06/14/2018 12:42:06 PM PDT by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective

David Boies is working for Rich’s family? The erstwhile super-lawyer? Who is paying for that?

Are you kidding me?

This is a straight-up Dem information suppression operation.

As others have said on various threads, if Dem operatives killed Rich because he was motivated by Bernie Sanders getting a raw deal... blood in the streets.

What I don’t get is the issue of “authorizing Wikileaks”. Assange is in the never-never land of a precarious embassy sanctuary. I don’t see how he responds or cares about authorization.

Unless, it’s a point of honor with him about his sources.


10 posted on 06/14/2018 12:42:30 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine ("Married with children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

I heard he has not internet or cell phone.


11 posted on 06/14/2018 12:43:22 PM PDT by mplc51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Official permission being something from the person who gave them the info or his estate.


12 posted on 06/14/2018 12:43:30 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: detective

What a lousy brother. More loyal to the Democrat Party than he is to his own Dead Brother. What a POS


13 posted on 06/14/2018 12:45:05 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Does WikiLeaks need authorization?
********************************
WikiLeaks is known for protecting its sources and wants to protect that reputation. That’s why they won’t release information on the source of the DNC data leak without approval of the Rich family.

It’s still a mystery to me why the Rich family doesn’t Want to give it’s permission. Seth Rich can’t be murdered twice, after all.


14 posted on 06/14/2018 12:45:20 PM PDT by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: detective

Release the truth about the hacked emails! This will prove once and for all that the Russians did it (colluding with Trump, of course)! /s


15 posted on 06/14/2018 12:46:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

He may be. His attorney has no business whatsoever telling Wikileaks they can’t divulge who gave them the information, particularly if Seth is dead.

The attorney should have keep his big fat foot out of his mouth.


16 posted on 06/14/2018 12:46:35 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
"What I don’t get is the issue of “authorizing Wikileaks”. Assange is in the never-never land of a precarious embassy sanctuary. I don’t see how he responds or cares about authorization."

Because Wikileaks guarantees they will protect the source.

Did Seth Rich autorize wikileaks to reveal he was the source and if so how he got the info? Before Hillary sent him to Fort Marcy park?

17 posted on 06/14/2018 12:46:40 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mark17

That more or less confirms who was the leaker. The family is being threatened and doesn’t want their son labeled as a Rat. National hero actually.


18 posted on 06/14/2018 12:51:23 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

What a lousy brother. More loyal to the Democrat Party than he is to his own Dead Brother. What a POS

~~~~

This family had their home stormed by a political swat team of lawyers and I dare say enforcers before blood dried. What do you think they were going to do? Refuse ‘protection’?


19 posted on 06/14/2018 12:54:53 PM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Someone check the parents’ retirement account. Is the brother married with kids? If so, check their college account. I’ll bet they’re sitting pretty financially.


20 posted on 06/14/2018 12:56:04 PM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson