Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY DOES PETER STRZOK WANT TO TALK TO HOUSE COMMITTEE?
shameless vanity | 6-23-2018 | wayoverontheright

Posted on 06/23/2018 7:57:35 AM PDT by wayoverontheright

First to answer the inevitable question as to why Peter Strzok is still employed by the FBI. Because Inspectors General, in this case Michael Horowitz, cannot "interview" former employees, only current ones, and the IG isn't done with Agent Strzok just yet.

Why doesn't Strzok just resign, as others have? Because he is negotiating with Horowitz/Huber (Sessions?) as to how long he may be in prison, and he still has information which, at least in the mind of Strzok, has more value than Horowitz/Huber esteem it to have.

What might this information be? Is it just not valuable? Unlikely but perhaps so.

Remember, Lisa Page was allowed to resign after giving up McCabe. Peter Strzok's value then, has nothing to do with McCabe. I seriously doubt Strzok has anything on Comey which exceeds that which McCabe could, and eventually will, provide. I don't think what Strzok knows and believes has great value has anything to do with Comey.

Then who?

Strzok reported to Priestap, but deliberately skipped over Priestap to report directly to Andrew McCabe. That would be the Andrew McCabe whose wife received over $500k from Hillary crony Terry McAuliffe to nearly completely fund her run for elective office in Virginia. I don't think it's a stretch to infer that HRC "requested" this payment in exchange for some very important favors to Hillary. It's how they roll.

Was Strzok directly told by McCabe that Hillary was running this op, or did he just figure it out? Insurance policy anyone?

From the IG report:

"We identified instances where FBI employees improperly received benefits from reporters, including tickets to sporting events, golfing outings, drinks and meals, and admittance to nonpublic social events,"

NON PUBLIC social events. Hmmmmmm..... Just when do reporters do non-public anything? When they are scheming/colluding with pols they favor for mutual benefit maybe?

It's my bet that Strzok was a favorite invitee to these non-public events. We already know that at least one FISA judge may have attended, again, is it a stretch that HRC, Inc. wouldn't have some presence at these klatches in order to steer the ruse that we all know occurred?

Isn't Strzok an FBI agent? An FBI agent into "insurance policies"? He thought he had his get-out-of-jail card, and now Horowitz/Huber (Sessions?) want nothing of it? Isn't it curious that DOJ and IG have no problem with their witness blabbering to Congress? It is clear they just want this booger off their finger.

So Strzok thinks he's scrzewed. He thinks by talking to the house committee they will intervene on his behalf. If the committee in general and Goodlatte in particular are not interested, then Strzok is really scrzewed, and so are we.

This is my attempt to answer the question as to why Peter Strzok would want to talk to the committee. It is born of my visceral distaste for HRC, and the knowledge that you seldom go wrong assuming the very worst about these people.

All of them.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; FReeper Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: corruption; horowitz; huber; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Note: shameless promo. I just started on Twitter. Twitter just doesn't lend itself to shameless conjectural screeds. Only 5 followers. Relatives mostly. Twitter handle: Lefty Paingood. @lpaingood
1 posted on 06/23/2018 7:57:35 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

Strzok’s lawyer told the Washington Post that his client “wants the chance to clear his name and tell his story”:


2 posted on 06/23/2018 8:05:53 AM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

Clear his name..what a joke. He knows he is being thrown under the bus to protect higher ups. He may want to cut an immunity deal.


3 posted on 06/23/2018 8:08:17 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

I think Hillary hooked him up with a good lawyer that created a somewhat plausible cover story based on the public texts.


4 posted on 06/23/2018 8:08:45 AM PDT by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
First to answer the inevitable question as to why Peter Strzok is still employed by the FBI. Because Inspectors General, in this case Michael Horowitz, cannot "interview" former employees, only current ones,

I was wondering about that, thanks for explaining.

5 posted on 06/23/2018 8:10:34 AM PDT by Lockbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jayster

This sucker wants to paint others with tar and do it while getting some immunity.

Congressional oversight is playing into the hands of the left.


6 posted on 06/23/2018 8:11:25 AM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

I don’t know if your answers are correct, but your questions are intriguing.

One thing I noticed - by my memory it seems like Lisa Page asked the setup questions, which Strzok would answer. For example the last one we found in the IG report, paraphrasing, Lisa Page said Trump will never be president, right? And Strzok said, don’t worry, we’ll take him out. He seems to be the one with the aggressive answers and mind-set.


7 posted on 06/23/2018 8:13:05 AM PDT by JohnEBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jayster
Strzok’s lawyer told the Washington Post that his client “wants the chance to clear his name and tell his story”:

LOL

I'm sure Al Capone wanted a chance to clear his name and tell his story...

8 posted on 06/23/2018 8:14:17 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Marxism: Wonderful theory, wrong species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

Strzok maintained a secret back channel to Valarie Jarret. His task was to confirm info channeled by others


9 posted on 06/23/2018 8:14:29 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... In August our cities will be burning))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak

He wants full use immunity. He isn’t getting that.


10 posted on 06/23/2018 8:18:40 AM PDT by Kozy (new age haruspex; "Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

Because he doesn’t know how to shut up.


11 posted on 06/23/2018 8:34:10 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

Does Strzok have something on Mueller and his crew of political assailants? He was in on the Russia investigation from the beginning.

He probably wants to use info on Hitlery and con-man comey for immunity or some type of deal.


12 posted on 06/23/2018 8:35:06 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Abolish administrative law. It's regressive, medieval and unconstitutional!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jayster

Hey give poor little Peter a chance. He accidentally said bad words in thousands and thousands of texts. He didn’t mean it! Poor little Peter.


13 posted on 06/23/2018 8:36:35 AM PDT by BlueHorseShoe ( Let us all speak out, rise up, lead and conquer! I’m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

Obstrzoktion of Justice.


14 posted on 06/23/2018 8:37:31 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

Strzok will claim he believed the information on Trump the candidate and did so with a zeal commensurate with his status in the FBI. At all times he acted in good faith. His insurance discussion and making sure Trump didn’t become President all admissions but were only done and said because of his belief in Russian interference and that poor candidate Hillary was a target of that interference. It could have been Bernie Sanders or any other candidate though. Just happened to be Hillary. And the MSM will lap it up and state the deep state conspiracy is over since there never was such a conspiracy.


15 posted on 06/23/2018 8:38:00 AM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright

First up is the House Joint Comittee, which is well stocked with hardass Patriots. Jordan, DeSantis, etc. It ain’t going to be pattycake, other than the usual dem disinformation buffoonery.


16 posted on 06/23/2018 8:40:01 AM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables (Donate to Mike Flynn's legal fund: https://mikeflynndefensefund.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

Strzok does seem to be trapped in a corner with very few options. His paper trail is too large and enough has been exposed that he has few options. His last remaining option may be to burn everything to the ground in hopes his own skin will be saved. It seems that the rats are starting to get ready to turn on each other. They seem to be trying to get immunity. That implies guilt on their part. Time to squeeze them harder.


17 posted on 06/23/2018 8:41:13 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

“Obstrzoktion of Justice.”

Love it!


18 posted on 06/23/2018 8:49:10 AM PDT by Jayster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wayoverontheright
WHY DOES PETER STRZOK WANT TO TALK TO HOUSE COMMITTEE?

To use his testimony and notoriety as a platform to stoke The Resistance.

This creep is a true-believing, committed leftist and nothing coming out of his mouth should be trusted.

19 posted on 06/23/2018 9:00:28 AM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jayster

ANd yet they failed to schedule an appearance with Goodlatte...desto the subpoena.


20 posted on 06/23/2018 9:02:47 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike ("itYou can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson