Posted on 07/07/2018 10:51:51 PM PDT by Enlightened1
The messages convey a sense of urgency, and are coming with increasing frequency. They are short, focused reactions to the latest “outrage” committed by President Trump.
Some end by asking for money, some urge participation in protests. All read as if they are sent from the official headquarters of the resistance.
Hillary Clinton is up to something.
Five times in the last month alone, she sent e-mails touting her super PAC’s role in combating President Trump. Most seized on headline events, such as the family-separation issue at the southern border.
Under the message line, “horrific,” she wrote June 18: “This is a moral and humanitarian crisis. Everyone of us who has ever held a child in their arms, and every human being with a sense of compassion and decency should be outraged.” She said she warned about Trump’s immigration policies during the 2016 campaign.
Three days later, she was back again, saying that her group, Onward Together, raised $1 million and would split it among organizations working to change border policy, including the American Civil Liberties Union and a gaggle of immigrant, refugee, Latino and women’s groups.
And the day after Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement, Clinton introduced a newly minted resistance partner. Called Demand Justice, it promises to protect “reproductive rights, voting rights and access to health care” by keeping Senate Democrats united in opposing any conservative Trump nominee.
The instant, in-house nature of Demand Justice was reflected by the name of its executive director: Brian Fallon, Clinton’s campaign press secretary.
In truth, Fallon’s role doesn’t tell us something we didn’t know. Onward Together, formed in May of 2017, is a Clinton 2020 campaign vehicle in waiting.
Its homepage says the group “is dedicated to advancing the vision that earned nearly 66 million votes...
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
It will not happen if she is locked up.
From your mouth to God’s ear.
I hope she does run... that will be a hoot for sure.
If she’s the best they got for 2020, that party might not make it that far.
I am concerned she would try to steal the election.
I know she tried that in 2016, but the red wave was too big.
She never quit running
The Harold Stassem if the left
Let me guess. Mueller and Co. gave her a heads up about something big coming out and as a result she finds an easy path to victory or so she thinks.
This woman is like Jason in that series of horror movies, seemingly dead at the end of each movie, but always ready for a sequel.
I hope they have her van ready with 2020 on the side.
Nobody could be that deranged. Could they?
One thing she has going for her, this time. The DNC will know where and how many votes to stuff in the ballot boxes. Last time, they were so sure she had it in the bag, they only did their customary level of cheating.
In 2020, they will set ballot box records … precincts will have double or triple votes compared to the number of people in the precinct.
bookmark
Nobody could be that deranged. Could they?
><
Yes.
But even the remote possibility of her winning is very scary.
You got that right. They will never again be slack in their cheating.
I don’t think she’d find the party leadership, membership, voters, or women happy to see her try running again. Hopefully she finds herself under investigation, indicted, at trial, or in jail, which would make the attempt to fail again at running for president moot.
Is she running? Good heavens, can anyone doubt it? Does she still own the DNC? Yes. Does she still have a core of well-heeled donors on speed dial? Yes. Has she learned from her well-documented errors in the last election? No.
Will love watching her get tossed in to the van like a side of beef again.
Too late for Broom Hilda. The Bernie Socialist Crazies are already splitting the party beyond repair.
The party leadership is her only concern, the others will fall into place. As for the party leaders, she can simply have them murdered or framed by the FBI for some bogus crime.
But, she can't even win a debate when she's been given the questions in advance. She's a total loser.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.