Skip to comments.Schumer says Trump pick must divulge thoughts on Roe v. Wade
Posted on 07/09/2018 12:47:18 PM PDT by jazusamo
Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer launched a preemptive attack Monday on President Trumps looming Supreme Court pick, saying the nominee must share their personal views on abortion in order to be confirmed.
Mr. Schumer, New York Democrat, said senators should no longer accept general promises of fealty to precedent, and will instead demand...
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
I just want a temporary job at the next restaurant that Schucks Chumer eats at - so I can spit in his food.
Hey Scmucky..what you say is absolutely IRRELEVANT..the Democrats are the MINORITY party I mind as well ask the local hobo what he thinks..if Hillary Clinton were President, she would have gotten her list from moveon.org and Planned Parenthood and the left would have been totally fine with that
They all gonna lose their minds in a few hours. Again. And again...and again...
Because precedent is the moral authority...
“I did it to make you stroke-out Schmuck.”
The dims are just gonna have to understand, that times change.....change is coming.
Tell Chuckles the Clown that we do not and will not divulge our strategy to the enemy - EVER.
As the United Negro College Fund used to say, "It's a terrible thing to lose your mind."
Enough holes have developed in the “reasoning” in Roe, such as it might be called, that a Mack truck could come through. Let it be Trump’s Mack truck. Leaving a dead skunk in the middle of the road that’s stinking to high heaven.
“A mind is a terrible thing to waste.”
They go through this every time. You can’t ask judges for a decision with no case in front of them. And you can’t hold them to a philosophy if you demand that they state one.
Sometimes the strategy is to just tell the truth and come through like a bulldozer.
Schumer says the nominee must share their personal views on abortion in order to be confirmed......
LOLOL...he thinks they get to set the ‘conditions’.
Support Free Republic, Folks!
There’ll be plenty of time for that after their confirmed.
No, she doesn’t
Why? Supreme Court nominees don't divulge where they stand on individual issues, because there may be cases brought before The Court on those issues, and then those with integrity would be forced to recuse themselves.
sChmukie Schumer isn't going to vote for them anyway, so I hope they tell him to go to hell.
Just send him some DelMonte prepackaged Veggie snacks...............
Wrong, Schmuckey! It is entirely inappropriate for a judicial nominee to be asked or answer a question about their opinion on court case they were not involved in.
Keep the questioning to Constitutional, legal and judicial principles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.