Did Shannon Watts Just Admit Gun Control Is Unconstitutional?

bearingarms.com ^ | 7/11/2018 | Tom Knighton

[rktman]

Shannon Watts gets a little unhinged when it comes to guns. We all know that. She sees an individual’s right to keep and bear arms as something that should pretty much be abolished, and anyone who disagrees with her is a target of her scorn…when they’re not being blocked on Twitter, at least.

With the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court, she has yet another excuse to spew her bile all over social media. In the process, she may have made a bit of a slip-up.

[rktman]

A little unhinged? Understatement. Anyway, she'll say she was misundercommented or something. HAGs, keep it up.

[rockrr]

The author is awarding far more credit for watt’s analytic capabilities than I believe are warranted.

[rktman]

LOL! See that imagination over there? Ya gotta stretch it quite a bit but it’s doable.

[cranked]

Further proof on the utter retarded nature of DEM libtard progressivism.......

[july4thfreedomfoundation]

This Shannon Watts moonbat is Michael Bloomturd’s ho.

I wonder how much he pays her?

[Lurkinanloomin]

“Well, they didn’t define “shall not be infringed” in the Constitution...........

[rktman]

:-) LOL! Yeah, “infringe” is pretty vague isn’t it.

[60Gunner]

Who the hell is Shannon Watts, and why the hell should I care?

[rktman]

Head cheese of " moms 'demand' action" HAGs " Housewives Against Guns" all bought and paid for by little mikey Bloomberg. 👹

[mlo]

If posting excerpts, try to post the money quotes. Nothing says you can only excerpt the top.

This was her tweet:

"Judge Kavanaugh has applied an extreme and dangerous interpretation of the Second Amendment when determining whether a law is constitutional, one that does not take into account a law’s impact on public safety."

[paulcissa]

The author questions whether or not she is intent on destroying our Constitutional rights, or whether she’s too stupid to realize that’s in-fact what she’s doing.

I choose to believe each and every one of these self-proclaimed do-gooders knows EXACTLY what they’re doing and should be address as the purposeful tyrants that they are.

To think otherwise is failure to see the enemy for what they are. The enemy.

[SunkenCiv]

Judge Kavanaugh has applied an extreme and dangerous interpretation of the Second Amendment when determining whether a law is constitutional, one that does not take into account a law’s impact on public safety... President Trump vowed he’d never let the @NRA down, and with the Kavanaugh pick, he chose someone whose judicial record demonstrates a dangerous view of the Second Amendment that elevates gun rights over public safety. The Senate should vote down this nomination. -- Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) July 10, 2018