Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mother Jones: Kavanaugh Could Deal a Big Blow to Gun Control
Mother Jones ^ | 07/10/18 | Kara Voght

Posted on 07/12/2018 6:18:39 PM PDT by Simon Green

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: KarlInOhio

“Thus a musket would not be in common use in our time but an AR-15 would be.”

Nonsense.

The AR-15 platform has been the most popular rifle sold for decades, but the liberals don’t like it.

So it can’t be in common use.


21 posted on 07/12/2018 9:07:16 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green
Kavanaugh Could Deal a Big Blow to Gun Control

Great, I'm in!

22 posted on 07/12/2018 9:22:13 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

The editorial staff of Mother Jones would have all us “reactionaries” sent to GULAG labor camps had they the power to do so. They are incipient Lenin- and Stalin- worshipers, every one.

But first they have to take away the guns and that’s not going to happen now is it, “comrade”?

;^)


23 posted on 07/12/2018 9:54:59 PM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Libtards don’t have time for this now.

They are lurching left and fighting for their life.
/
/

We’ll see come midterms. Don’t ever underestimate both the GOP-e and Dems getting together with the globalist money supplying overlords and working to sink Trump and his agenda with this upcoming election. And we’ll be told by the media propaganda machine that “well the people rejected Trump” when in reality it will be money and fraud.


24 posted on 07/12/2018 11:22:11 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lightman; Simon Green; mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; ...

RKBA Ping List


This Ping List is for all things pertaining to the 2nd Amendment.

FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.

More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.


25 posted on 07/13/2018 3:48:08 AM PDT by PROCON ('Progressive' is a Euphemism for Totalitarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Winning. Not tired yet.

5.56mm


26 posted on 07/13/2018 5:35:20 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Gun control is finished.

Cody Wilson won his case.

If I were to travel back to the 80s and tell people that i’m from the future and this device in my hand can broadcast to the entire world and there’s little to nothing government can do about it, they’d all laugh and think I’m crazy. If you recall the furor about encryption in the 90s, you’ll understand. Now encryption is in everything.

With Defense Distributed’s winning decision this week, we are in the same place as it comes to firearms. It may seem kooky today, in 30 years, anyone will be able to produce firearms despite how hard governments attempt to crack down on it. Oh, sure there will be rules, penalties, jailing and such, but they won’t be able to stop it.


27 posted on 07/13/2018 5:45:25 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress
Give Shit-Stroke the Purple Heart they say.........

When I heard that I could taste the hurl in my mouth. Reminded me of another of the commie left's purple heart heroes, JFK (who served in Viet Nam), who took a self inflicted bullet wound to his butt.

John Kerry's 'self-inflicted' Purple Heart, Bronze Star


28 posted on 07/13/2018 6:52:04 AM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Thanks for posting this reality of many Freepers! I would add Judge Gorsuch!

Like Judge Thomas and Judge Scalia and Alioto? Too many people just love being Debbie Downers and not allow any happiness.

29 posted on 07/13/2018 7:04:26 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Trump: "Families of American citizens murdered by illegals are permanently separated from them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

I agree! I’m tired of being made to be a villain by the left, shall not be infringed is pretty plain English.


30 posted on 07/13/2018 7:24:18 AM PDT by nobamanomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

I think we’ll need to replace one more liberal SC justice with an originalist before things start to turn around. I don’t see Ginsberg living much longer and Sotomayor’s health is in question and Breyer is getting old.

On the minus side, Thomas has said that he has no intention of dying in the seat, so I think he’ll retire soon because I don’t think he’ll risk staying on and Trump not being re-elected and then having to try to outlive the next maybe liberal president for two terms.


31 posted on 07/13/2018 8:54:06 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (The ONLY purpose for gun control is so that one group can force its will on a less powerful group.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

The term “common use at the time” does not refer to the weapons used in 1791.


Here’s another, related, point: IF “common use at the time” DOES refer to the state of firearms technology in 1791, then logically the First Amendment protections regarding Freedom of the Press would also only protect those technologies available in 1791 to disseminate information and political views. Thus, there would be no way to halt government restrictions (or outright bans) on high-speed presses, radio, television, cell phones and the Internet. Is Rolling Stone (or any other reflexively anti-gun person or entity) going to argue for that kind of an interpretation of ALL of the Constitution and Bill of Rights? You would think not, but they just walked into that trap like a retarded rat on crack. Liberalism/Leftism truly is a mental disorder.

That idiotic argument aside, it doesn’t even begin to deal with the militia issues, nor with the Article 1, Section 8 power of Congress to issue “Letters of Marque and Reprisal.” Those are authorization for PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS to hijack enemy commercial shipping and to fight enemy warships, and necessarily presumes that those private individual possess powerful and modern weapons. I’d LOVE to see someone argue against THAT in front of Kavanaugh, who is supposed a fount of knowledge on the historical background to the Constitution. He’d tear them at least 2 or 3 new orifices.


32 posted on 07/13/2018 10:34:28 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

“Winning. Not tired yet.”


Yes...Trump lied about this, the SOB.

Most people that I speak with that voted for him are like the guy with a sweet tooth who is given unlimited candy and pastries...we NEVER get tired of it, we just want more, more, MOOOOOOOOOORE!

Thank you, President Trump! These are going to be 8 of the happiest years in the lives of tens of millions of your fellow citizens (and not the least of the reasons for that is that these same 8 years will be the absolute WORST years of the lives of several tens of millions of our libtardian fellow citizens). Keep up the fantastic work!!!!


33 posted on 07/13/2018 10:37:56 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Malsua

“Gun control is finished.

Cody Wilson won his case.”


People don’t understand the significance of this case (which he didn’t actually win in court - because the .gov settled, knowing that they had ZERO chance of winning).

In probably less than 10 years, the materials science behind 3-D printing will likely have advanced enough so that someone could buy a machine for about $1,000 - $2,000 that could quickly, and without error, make firearms that are as accurate and durable as any made in a “regular” gun factory.

See my tagline...and read van Vogt’s book, “The Weapons Shops of Isher,” for some background on where we are headed. As you might imagine for a fan of that book, I am absolutely ECSTATIC about what happened with the Defense Distributed case. This is a combination of Yorktown, VE Day and VJ Day and winning a huge Powerball lottery, all at once.


34 posted on 07/13/2018 10:42:49 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“On the minus side, Thomas has said that he has no intention of dying in the seat, so I think he’ll retire soon because I don’t think he’ll risk staying on and Trump not being re-elected and then having to try to outlive the next maybe liberal president for two terms.”


I see where you’re coming from - Thomas certainly doesn’t want to repeat the RBG mistake with Her Beastness in 2016. However, I think that with every week that passes Trump’s policies are being seen to work better and better, and many people in the middle are coming to grudgingly admire his skills (and even, a bit, his style). Trump is headed for a landslide win in 2020, similar to Reagan in ‘84 (and for the same reasons). No, Trump won’t get 49 states...but he’ll get 375 - 400 EVs. Thomas will, IMHO, resign at the end of the 2021 term so that his successor can be nominated without the controversy of an “election year” appointment. That’ll also be 30 years of him on the Court, and he’d have more than earned the right to hang up his cleats.


35 posted on 07/13/2018 10:47:04 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

They make it sound like it’s a bad thing.


36 posted on 07/13/2018 11:26:57 AM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey; arrogantsob
judges the Republicans picked who needed Democrat votes for confirmation because the Republicans lacked a majority tended to “evolve” to the left once they get on the High Court.
The Reid Rule obviates that, as long as the Republicans have a majority in the Senate.

37 posted on 07/13/2018 2:46:52 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Journalism promotes itself - and promotes big government - by speaking ill of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
Judge Kavanaugh just uses the first part of that phrase, “in common use” and leaves out the “at the time” part.

Liberals would "have a cow' if the 1st Amendment was so judicated to be restricted to only the technology of that time. It would read like this;

"The First Amendment only applies to the type press commonly in uae at the time of the Founders. No TV, no radio, no internet. And papers have to use labour intensive manuel set type and single sheet printing "to be protected by the Constitution. Everything else will be tightly regulated, if not owned by the state."

One can see liberal heads exploding everywhere!
38 posted on 07/13/2018 3:21:04 PM PDT by RedMonqey ("Those who turn their arms in for plowshares will be doing the plowing for those who didnÂ’t.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

I think it makes it less likely to have to settle for “dud’ like Souter but doesn’t eliminate it entirety because of squishes like Collins and Corker(my senator but not for long)


39 posted on 07/13/2018 3:27:05 PM PDT by RedMonqey ("Those who turn their arms in for plowshares will be doing the plowing for those who didnÂ’t.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey
I think it makes it less likely to have to settle for “dud’ like Souter but doesn’t eliminate it entirety because of squishes like Collins and Corker(my senator but not for long)
. . . but there is also the factor that during the campaign, Trump published a “long" list of 25 people he would consider for SCOTUS. He has now nominated two people from that list.

The fact that Trump won election in that context puts an additional onus on whoever claims that such a nominee is “out of the mainstream” to make a coherent case.

If the Democrats could make that case about any one long-list person, their main chance to exploit that weakness was before the election. They didn’t whiff, exactly - they didn’t even swing at the pitch. Shame on them. Trump blew a fastball right by them, and they were not ready to swing.

In reality, they didn’t think they had to take Trump seriously. Now they should just put a paper bag on their head.


40 posted on 07/14/2018 7:56:25 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Journalism promotes itself - and promotes big government - by speaking ill of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson