Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JayGalt
You shift the definitions and the terms.

Then you should have no problem citing an example.

On the other hand, if you were intellectually dishonest, and just trying to save face before disengaging from the discussion, you’d provide some painfully transparent excuse such as “you’re not worth my time” for NOT providing said example.

47 posted on 07/16/2018 7:11:25 PM PDT by papertyger (Bulverism: it's not just for liberals anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

Do you even know the meaning of the words you use? Example of what?

I gave examples at the beginning of the thread, concrete examples of how man and women have both been patriotic and sacrificed for our country.

You called that cherry picking. I explained that examples refute generalizations. In the most concrete sense I showed that women & men have behaved the same way because of strong political belief. Not all men or all women just some.

You danced side wards and said I was trying to conflate generalizations with universal premises and that is a scurvy trick of liberals. As far as I can tell it the two are entwined, not separate at all so perhaps the Liberals are not so tricksey after all. I gave you the philosophical text that laid out the close relationship.

Your statements are ambiguous and shift to attack new strawmen rather than actually stating your beliefs and defending them. My tagline was chosen to remind myself to disengage and I will do so now. You may have your last word.


48 posted on 07/16/2018 7:37:35 PM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson