Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Watch: FBI Begins Releasing Strzok-Page Communications, DOJ Objects to Preservation Order
Judicial Watch ^ | July 13, 2018 | Tom Fitton

Posted on 07/13/2018 12:28:01 PM PDT by jazusamo

Judicial Watch obtains the first court-ordered production of Strzok-Page communications from the FBI

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has received 87 pages of records from the Department of Justice revealing former top FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page’s profanity-laced disdain for FBI hierarchy and policies. The DOJ, meanwhile, is resisting Judicial Watch’s request for a court order to preserve all responsive Page-Strzok communications.

Strzok and Page’s anti-Trump text messages became center-stage amid allegations of bias at the Bureau, and both have been subpoenaed to testify before the House Judiciary and the Oversight and Government Reform Committees.

Judicial Watch obtained the documents through a January 2018 Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit filed after the DOJ failed to respond to a December 4, 2017, FOIA request ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:18-cv-00154)). The lawsuit is seeking:

Emails between Strzok and Page include conversations about a change in FBI policy that eventually would allow companies to discuss National Security Letters , which are secret non-court issued subpoenas for records:

From: Strzok, Peter P. (WF) (FBI)

Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 3:34 PM

To: Page, Lisa C. (OGC) (FBI)

Subject: FWD: FBI to Allow Companies to Reveal When They Receive National Security Letters

Sigh…are you f’ing kidding…

From: Page, Lisa C. (OGC) (FBI)

Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 3:36 PM

To: Strzok, Peter P. (WF) (FBI)

Subject: RE: FBI to Allow Companies to Reveal When They Receive National Security Letters

Sigh. This is the third conversation I will have had with him or someone on his staff about this.

On February 9, 2015, in a discussion of an article about how the Department of Defense may have unwisely used an Arabic translator in a Guantanamo hearing who had also been used as a translator at a CIA black site, Strzok says, “I cannot begin to describe the amount of f*ckupedness if true…” Page replies, “I know. I heard about it on npr on my way home tonight. Multiple mentions of the FBI’s infiltration of defense teams last year too.”

On June 1, Judicial Watch filed a motion for preservation order in this case to asking the court to order the Department of Justice to prevent both Strzok and Page from potentially deleting any incriminating records of their communications. Judicial Watch argues that several of the text messages produced to Congress reference work-related communications between Strzok and Page through personal accounts.

Judicial Watch notes that in January , the DOJ told Congress that the FBI had neither requested nor searched information from the personal accounts of Strzok and Page. Judicial Watch argues:

In a January 25, 2018 letter to Senator Charles Grassley, Charles Thorley, Acting Assistant Director of the FBI, wrote, “FBI has not requested from Ms. Page or Mr. Strzok any information from their personal email accounts, nor has the FBI conducted searches of non-FBI issued communications devices or non-FBI email accounts associated with Mr. Strzok or Ms. Page….”

Under the law, “[a]n officer or employee of an executive agency may not create or send a record using a non-official electronic messaging account unless such officer or employee- (1) copies an official electronic messaging account of the officer or employee in the original creation or transmission of the record; or (2) forwards a complete copy of the record to an official electronic messaging account of the officer or employee not later than 20 days after the original creation or transmission of the record.”

Not until May did the FBI say it had written Strzok and Page letters asking them to preserve the communications but there have been no assurances that this was even done:

[Judicial Watch] has asked for copies of those letters and of any responses it has received from Strzok and Page. [DOJ] refuses to provide any evidence supporting this assertion.

Because [Judicial Watch] does not know specifically what [DOJ] asked Strzok and

Page to do and what, if any, steps Strzok and Page are taking to ensure preservation, [Judicial Watch] is concerned [DOJ’s] mere requests to Strzok and Page are insufficient. [Judicial Watch] therefore is concerned records responsive to [Judicial Watch’s] FOIA request will be lost or not otherwise searched.

[Judicial Watch’s] request is nothing out of the ordinary. At least three other judges of this Court have granted such requests in the last 18 months.

“Judicial Watch is in court successfully getting Strzok-Page documents thus far denied to Congress,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Yet the Justice Department is stonewalling and even protecting Strzok and Page by battling our request for preservation order to ensure that no government documents are destroyed.”

The newly obtained emails came in response to a May 21, order by U.S. District Court Judge Reggie B. Walton to the FBI to begin processing 13,000 pages of previously undisclosed records exchanged exclusively between FBI officials Strzok and Page between February 1, 2015, and December 2017. The first 500 pages of records are to be processed by June 29, 2018. This process will take over two years to complete.

###


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 201502; 20150201; 20150204; 20150209; 201712; doj; eavesdropping; emails; fbi; foia; gitmo; judicialwatch; jw; lisapage; nsl; oversight; page; personalphones; reggiewalton; slowwalking; strzok; strzoktexts; surveillance; taxdollarsatwork; traslators; walton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Strzok is a foul mouthed psychopath.

Bold lettering mine.

1 posted on 07/13/2018 12:28:01 PM PDT by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Strzok is a foul mouthed psychopath.

****************

Although the entire country got to see exactly how strange and creepy Strzok is, evidently his colleagues and superiors did not view him that way. What does that say about them?


2 posted on 07/13/2018 12:32:47 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

And still a government employee. Amazing.


3 posted on 07/13/2018 12:33:13 PM PDT by donozark (Restraining orders are just another way of saying I love you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Good point, seems to be normal behavior.


4 posted on 07/13/2018 12:35:14 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: donozark
And still a government employee. Amazing.

As is Rosenstein who is not only employed, he's running the show.

And Bill Priestap is still there. Remember when some folks thought he was "singing like a bird"?

5 posted on 07/13/2018 12:40:49 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

We saw the truth yesterday about the US Government.

The bureaucracy of the US Government is over run with narcissistic smug little beta male psychopaths like Strzok


6 posted on 07/13/2018 12:42:25 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (2016: For the first time since 1984, I voted for a Rep President all other votes were anti Dem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Strzok is the definition of DC Swamp dweller. He even went to Georgetown Univ., and has been planted in the FBI echo-chamber and the greater DC bubble ever since.

The top bureaucrats of the FBI no doubt go around constantly reminding themselves how just, righteous and heroic they are, impressed with their power and ability to have wormed their way up the greasy pole of Fed.gov politics. Of course, no one contradicts them. They believe their own propaganda. Strzok is exhibit 1A


7 posted on 07/13/2018 12:43:40 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

So were the messages from a private cell phone or from an FBI provided phone?


8 posted on 07/13/2018 12:43:42 PM PDT by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Bump!


9 posted on 07/13/2018 12:43:44 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

And these are still only the texts that Christopher Wray let Peter Strzok deem pertinent to the investigation to be turned over to the IG. The IG never saw all of the texts. When asked about this yesterday in the hearing Peter Strzok said he would refuse to release the remaining texts.


10 posted on 07/13/2018 12:45:14 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

MAGA!

Support Free Republic, Folks!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

11 posted on 07/13/2018 12:47:42 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
*All records of communications, including but not limited to, emails, text messages and instant chats, between FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI attorney Lisa Page;
* All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and expense reports of Peter Strzok;
*All travel requests, travel authorizations, travel vouchers and expense reports of Lisa Page.

I wonder if there is any evidence of Stzrok and Page using their expense account to pursue their affair. With both of them being married, you would expect that much of their "personal" time took place during work hours, and perhaps used a government credit card in order to keep the affair from their respective spouses.

My first thought was that it must be so obvious that this is already being investigated, but after seeing what's going on at the DoJ and FBI, I have to wonder.

12 posted on 07/13/2018 12:49:19 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

Yep, and it’ll be interesting to see if that remains that way, I doubt it will.


13 posted on 07/13/2018 12:49:47 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Repealthe17thAmendment

It wouldn’t surprise me at all if that’s what they did nor that the DOJ and FBI want to keep it under the rug.


14 posted on 07/13/2018 12:55:49 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“””Judicial Watch notes that in January, the DOJ told Congress that the FBI had neither requested nor searched information from the personal accounts of Strzok and Page”””


In yesterday’s hearing I noted the comment that the FBI/DOJ had not taken possession of Strzok and Page’s personal phones or computers to see if there was any incriminating evidence.

Is this the same procedure used by the FBI/DOJ when they are targeting someone else?


15 posted on 07/13/2018 1:02:31 PM PDT by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacknhoo

If they are on his FIB phone, aren’t they the property of the US taxpayers? How can anyone stop their release??


16 posted on 07/13/2018 1:08:39 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

17 posted on 07/13/2018 1:12:14 PM PDT by Dick Bachert (Why are damn near ALL the SEX FIENDS Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Swamp Thing

The Strzok theme song

(to the tune of Wild Thing

Swamp thing, you make Democrats sing
You make everything creepy, swamp thing
Swamp thing, you are lying trash
and We all know for sure
that you're a scum bag
psychopath

Swamp thing, you make real men laugh
You make everything creepy, swamp thing
Swamp thing, in justice you should hang
We all know for sure
you should be in jail
Lying thing
Swamp thing, you make Democrats sing
You make everything creepy, swamp thing
Swamp thing, the headmsmen's axe should swing

18 posted on 07/13/2018 1:15:39 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (2016: For the first time since 1984, I voted for a Rep President all other votes were anti Dem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Pete’s colleagues and superiors, knew the slime ball ‘Hatchet Man’ for what he was/is and entrusted him with the chore, to incite the left to down Trump. Originally it was to help the old hag. When she FAILED, they pursued, ever onward.
He will eventually, and probably soon, become expendable?
Brown, Foster and Rich come to mind?


19 posted on 07/13/2018 1:18:02 PM PDT by GOYAKLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

I think he’s bat guano crazy, he sure looks it.


20 posted on 07/13/2018 1:18:58 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson