ALSO, does ANYONE here truly believe Strzok is a heterosexual?!!!
Posted on 07/17/2018 3:28:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
FULL TITLE: Rep. Ratcliffe: Lisa Page’s Testimony Has ‘Significant Differences’ from Strzok’s on ‘Important Material Facts’
“I think there are significant differences between their testimony about important material facts,” Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) said Monday, comparing the testimonies of former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and her former love and colleague, FBI agent Peter Strzok.
Page’s testimony Monday in a closed-door House hearing was far more cooperative and informative that that of Strzok, who testified in a contentious hearing last week, LifeZette quotes Ratcliffe saying:
“I think there are significant differences between their testimony about important material facts,” Ratcliffe said.
“I think she has been as forthcoming as she can. I think she is trying to respect the real privileges that exist from her former employer, and she is getting direction from FBI counsel about not answering certain things and she is trying to respect that. At the same time, I think she is trying to give us as much information as she’s allowed to do, which I think is a distinction and difference from what we saw with Peter Strzok.”
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
bookmark
She told the truth?
Page burst into sobs and blurted out “I did it because I loved him. That’s why. I loved him! He told me he was going to divorce his wife and marry me if I just lied for him and stayed with him.”
Big deal, it’s just some House hearing.
“and she is getting direction from FBI counsel “
What? This is ridiculous. Strozk has also been advised by FBI counsel along with private counsel. This FBI counsel is in apparent conflict and has no business representing her as her interests may well be in conflict with Strozk and indeed with the FBI itself.
ALSO, does ANYONE here truly believe Strzok is a heterosexual?!!!
And this means.... what? More words?
Strzok appeared to have more than one screw loose.
If that guy is still considered to be FBI material, ouch!
In the old days they’d do neighborhood canvases, past employers, education information...
This guy seemed literally unstable the other day.
I can’t imagine him lasting six hours in the FBI ranks, after that performance.
Strzok is a CIA agent (Station Chief) and on loan to the FBI. A joint CIA/FBI position was created by Congress in 1996. Strzok was “a senior FBI official” by being the CIA’s Chief of Counterespionage.
It’s also being reported that he was born and lived for several years in Iran. He was Brennan’s and Obama’s point person for dealing with Iran as well.
https://brassballs.blog/home/strzok-worked-for-cia-and-fbi-at-the-same-time-in-counterespionage
“....she is trying to respect the real privileges that exist from her FORMER employer, and she is getting direction from FBI counsel about not answering certain things...”
I’m at a loss understanding WHAT she can’t answer. She’s under oath in a closed hearing being questioned about her past performance and direct knowledge of the perormance of other employees. If she has resigned, why is FBI council advising her? She can answer or take the 5th.
What rocket science do I not understand?
"...romance has soured..."
Good cop, bad cop testimony.
Lisa Page resigned from the FBI. Why would she be entitled to FBI lawyers? Strozk is still in FBI HR dept.
“I think she has been as forthcoming as she can. I think she is trying to respect the real privileges that exist from her former employer, and she is getting direction from FBI counsel about not answering certain things and she is trying to respect that. At the same time, I think she is trying to give us as much information as she’s allowed to do, which I think is a distinction and difference from what we saw with Peter Strzok.”
———-
Which means: she still spewed copious amounts of BS... just a little less, compared to Strzok.
That’s one weird gif, CWB.
Two observations
Why can’t she testify about everything she did at work? She should have done nothing illegal.
How would you feel if your wife cheated on you with someone like Strzok?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.