We are Peter Nicholas and Michael C. Bender of the Mocking Bird Media.
You ask why don't we report on Hillary receiving the dirty money from Browder?
HA HA HA!! HA! HA HA! Do you have to ask? DO YOU REALLY HAVE TO ASK??? HA! HA! HA HA!
One thinks that truly useful advisors would have predicted in advance exactly this Leftist-MSM narrative. It was pretty obvious it was coming, wasn’t it?
“people familiar with the matter said.”
Out of all the hit pieces by the MSM each day, they never name a source.
Not a name, position, title nothing.
Spit.
5.56mm
I’ve wondered if this was purposeful, to take attention off the Supreme Court nominee.
Trump has followed this tactic many times over the past two years.
None of this has anything to do with Russia. This is an attemp to weaken him so they can get rid of tarrifs
We are Peter Nicholas and Michael C. Bender of the Mocking Bird Media.
You ask why don't we report on Hillary receiving the dirty money from Browder?
HA HA HA!! HA! HA HA! Do you have to ask? DO YOU REALLY HAVE TO ASK??? HA! HA! HA HA!
More usual and customary fake news BS from the pink panty press.
The Halfrican KNEW he was going to be reelected but hit up Demos for campaign money.
Big whoopty do. I’ve left off “n’t” in countless posts on FR. It happens. You correct and move on. No big deal.
What damage?
If that was damage control then they did a poor job of it.
This is fake news
Does the WSJ ever publish any non-Fake News about President Trump?
Why would President Trump need any damage control? 79% of Republicans approve of the way President Trump handled that meeting and presser with Putin. The WSJ agrees with 91% of democrats and the MSM. That says a lot about the low reliability and quality of information published by the WSJ.