Posted on 08/06/2018 10:35:23 AM PDT by DFG
President Trump has “racist policies” and backs “internment camps" -- or at least that's what one allegedly reasonable argument used in a graduate school study guide would have readers believe.
The Law School Admission Test prep book, published by Windham Press, includes two questions related to Trump in its most recent guide, as first reported by The College Fix.
The LSAT prep book uses the following statement it says is “encountered on a daily basis through social media, entertainment, and cable news” as a reasonable argument why Trump is “unfit” to be president: “He lacks political experience and backs racist policies, such as internment camps and deportation."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
That should get someone fired....
Trump should send his black helicopters loaded with jack-booted storm troopers to haul this person off to a concentration camp. /s
No questions about the ‘Racist New York Times’ ?
People who intend you harm will tell you what they are going to do if you’ll just listen to them.
Alinsky says to accuse those you hate of doing what you are doing or are intending to do.
I’ve been around for awhile (71 years). Not as long as some, but longer than others, and I’ve never seen, nor heard Donald J. Trump before, or during his presidency favor internment camps, nor have I heard him state directly anything racist.
Perhaps somebody here at FRee Republic could enlighten me on something I’ve missed.
Sad.
5.56mm
If Bernie Sanders had two apples, and Hillary Clinton had four apples, and Al Gore had five apples, how much would life suck if they had all gotten elected?
Funny. It was Obama’s buddy, Bill Ayres who said they would need to kill 25 million of us in order to implement their plan. Liberals are nothing if not liars.
This nation has a serious pinko problem.
Same thing they do with polling. They can skew things all they want.
Reason Number 17,564 why colleges and universities should be shut down, closed, and denied access to young skulls full of mush.
In other words, this is an example of a series of logical fallacies, which the reader can be expected to identify at the risk of failing the test.
By the way, look at question # 7 in the second example. Does it remind you of a recent muslime-named black president?
it’s ok... they are talking about a Ronald Thump... not Donald Trump... no harm.
Who is Ronald Trump?
Trump? No.
Liberal bullies? Heck, yes.
EXPOSED: Anti-White “Hate Speech” on Twitter By CNN, Buzzfeed, NYT, and LA Times Reporters
https://medium.com/@getongab/exposed-anti-white-hate-speech-on-twitter-by-cnn-buzzfeed-nyt-and-la-times-reporters-fa72327e5010
leftards again thinking they can decide what is ‘reasonableness’
lawyers are largely parasites who have foisted a legal system that mostly pays them for being useless middlemen.
Lawyers weaken just society which is the leftist’s goal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.