Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge holds Roger Stone associate in contempt for refusing to testify in Russia investigation
The Washington Post ^ | 10 Aug 18 | Spencer S. Hsu and Devlin Barrett

Posted on 08/10/2018 10:29:57 AM PDT by EVO X

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: Moonman62
I guess this tactic is probably common.

It is.

41 posted on 08/10/2018 2:45:11 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: EVO X

There is NO investigation of Russian “interference” in the election.


42 posted on 08/10/2018 3:30:53 PM PDT by jimfree (My18 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

“There is no question about the authority of Grand Juries to compel testimony. What are you thinking along those lines?”

This entire case is so poorly defined with absolutely no criminal matter being investigated I suspect there are multiple lines of legal challenges to contest the subpoena for testimony.

They aren’t investigating a crime. They are investigating based on a counterintel matter. Without knowing all the relevant statutes, I suspect there are numerous grounds to challenge and they will be when the appeal is filed.

I’d await that filing to see what the basis is for the appeal. It may be quite good and people are kind of sick of being dragged into a phony Russia Collusion Hoax investigation.

The risk to the innocent is high. As a result, I find no issue with the lawyer declining to cooperate and testing the framework of the request.


43 posted on 08/10/2018 3:31:01 PM PDT by romanesq (For George Soros so loved the world, he gave us Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: romanesq

Perhaps I am out of bounds wrt the federal system but for non-specific investigation in the State courts there is no requirement that the subject be informed of the potential crime. No defense lawyers are allowed.

So since they have no role within the Jury Room, they have no standing outside the Jury Room.

I was Foreman of the Cook County Grand Jury in the 80’s and it was fascinating, quite an adventure.


44 posted on 08/10/2018 3:42:20 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EVO X

“…Mueller’s appointmentment is legitimate because he is supervised by a constitutionaly appointed officer”


So, neither the AG nor any of the DAs need to be confirmed?


45 posted on 08/10/2018 5:12:04 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Rosenstein was confirmed by the Senate 94-6. Mueller reports to Rosenstein.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/rod-rosenstein-confirmed-as-deputy-attorney-general/2017/04/25/e59bc3a8-29dc-11e7-be51-b3fc6ff7faee_story.html?utm_term=.8fc704766bba


46 posted on 08/10/2018 5:43:23 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: lepton
So, neither the AG nor any of the DAs need to be confirmed?

The issue is who is actually running the show. If Rosenstein is micromanaging everything a case can be made for the SC. If he just approves budgets and leaves the Mule team alone, a case can be made the appointment was out of order.

47 posted on 08/10/2018 5:50:16 PM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

The idea that only Russians tried mess things up during the last election doesn’t pass my smell test.


48 posted on 08/10/2018 6:02:47 PM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Roger Stone, Kristin Davis (the Manhattan Madam) and her son Carter


49 posted on 08/10/2018 7:00:04 PM PDT by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

There must be an adverse ruling to be appealed.


50 posted on 08/10/2018 7:01:15 PM PDT by MortMan (The white board is a remarkable invention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Code Is Free Speech


51 posted on 08/11/2018 8:15:31 AM PDT by 2harddrive (Go to www.CodeIsFreeSpeech.com for 10 FREE 3D-printer gun blueprints!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Rosenstein was confirmed by the Senate 94-6. Mueller reports to Rosenstein.


Fine, but the Judges argument suggests that Rosenstein did not actually need to be confirmed.


52 posted on 08/11/2018 8:49:17 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

You can get all the blueprints you want at the US Patent Office. They’re a matter of public record. And after the patents expire, you can produce the guns commercially.


53 posted on 08/11/2018 10:39:42 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (“If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Since 1950 deputy Attorneys General have been confirmed by the Senate.
For example, Obama’s longest serving Deputy Attorney General: “James Michael Cole is an American attorney who served as United States Deputy Attorney General from December 29, 2010 to January 8, 2015. He was first installed as Deputy Attorney General following a recess appointment by President Barack Obama on December 29, 2010. He then was confirmed by the United States Senate in a 55–42 vote on June 28, 2011.”—Wikipedia


54 posted on 08/11/2018 4:03:41 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Well, J.R. doesn’t censor it; HERE:

https://freespeechfirearms.us/


55 posted on 08/11/2018 9:53:37 PM PDT by HKMk23 (You ask how to fight an idea? Well, I'll tell you how: with another idea!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

>
IIRC, he stated that eventually this argument would be made in court, perhaps at the appeals stage, and would be found to be a valid argument, thereby rendering moot, null, and void everything Mueller did.
>

But, not before the leviathan has ground and sent to the poor-house, via the never-ending power and $$ (aka taxpayers), every soul it has touched.

And, though those souls may seek (*maybe* ultimately receive) restitution, their lives, and the taxpayer pockets, will never be whole.

Those the perpetrated this farce will *NEVER* be held accountable.


56 posted on 08/13/2018 5:30:42 AM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73
But, not before the leviathan has ground and sent to the poor-house, via the never-ending power and $$ (aka taxpayers), every soul it has touched.

It seems wrong to me that this is permitted in our society. In the case of a special prosecutor, there should be equal funds available to the target of the investigation, refundable to the government if a conviction is made. This is very unfair the way it’s set up.

57 posted on 08/13/2018 6:07:26 AM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson