Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
I can understand needing a security clearance to discuss a national security situation, but wouldn't a former CIA agent be able to answer questions, hypothetical or not, from a current CIA agent or official about their thoughts/opinions without having to be read in? Assuming, of course, that the former agent is reliably a patriot and not a Deep State lackey.
11 posted on 08/20/2018 2:48:14 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: skr

No. Anyone with a clearance discussing classified topics with someone not holding a clearance is breaking the law.


13 posted on 08/20/2018 3:17:21 AM PDT by Henry Hnyellar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: skr
Let’s look at our elite’s track record of (cough) success:

<><> We’re still chasing bandits in Afghanistan after nearly 17 years (thanks to the war-profiteering neocons),

<><> our best and brightest FBI are texting each other like hormonal teens while they try to undo the Trump election,

<><> our L/E can’t be bothered with following up on warnings about psychotic freaks who get online and publicly announce their plan to shoot up schools.

26 posted on 08/20/2018 6:56:55 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson