Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Socon-Econ

Agreed.

They have no interest in the upkeep of the property. Income issues aside, they’d also be the ones that fail the applications process (usually background investigation).


9 posted on 08/23/2018 3:47:34 PM PDT by setha (England: Once great, now lost to the Diversity Deviants & Mohammedans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: setha

Then again you have property owners that welcome those vouchers because they own slum like properties and those are the only renters they can get.


11 posted on 08/23/2018 3:53:35 PM PDT by eastforker (All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: setha

Agreed.

They have no interest in the upkeep of the property. Income issues aside, they’d also be the ones that fail the applications process (usually background investigation).
***********
Concerning section 8, if the feds increased their compensation enough and made it easier to evict troublemakers, the landlords would eventually participate voluntarily. But this would require the government to stop viewing landlords as class enemies.


47 posted on 08/23/2018 4:43:58 PM PDT by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson