Dems officially request delay in Kavanaugh hearing

The Washington Times ^ | August 24, 2018 | Stephen Dinan

[Lumper20]

Many of the deep state punks have been exposed. They fear exposing their sources of cash payments AKA “Money Trail.” Both houses of Congress are bought and paid for. I really wonder if these career political hacks know how to live an honest life? How many in our Congress are like the WWII types in the Congress we grew up with? These lawyers know jack—— about economics, and; they darn sure have no clue what administrative policy formulation is. These clowns “COULD NOT” manage a local McDonald’s, and; they make our laws. Our Government makes the mafia look good.

[Brian Griffin]

“too many questions”

Fewer questions, then, por favor.

He’s got work to do starting October 1st.

[DoughtyOne]

“:^)

[bigbob]

Officially. No.

[FLT-bird]

Denied.

Next!

[Sa-teef]

"......The guy delivers on this. Save criticism for something real."

Agreed.

Grassley and McConnell have been doing yeoman's work on judicial confirmations in an extremely hostile environment.

The Turtle has his shortcomings but this is where he shines.

[SES1066]

Dear Senators, take your pile of male bovine excrement and stick back in that bull!

[Tunehead54]

Ummm ... “Go pound sand”?

What did I win? ;-)

[frank ballenger]

I’m sorry.
He did provide the absolutely essential help needed to get Gorsuch in.

Forgive me.

[VanDeKoik]

Mitch has been such a flake on so much, itns easy to reflexively cringe at him.

Totally understandable.

[Architect of Avalon]

NO DELAYS.

[scottinoc]

Dems officially request delay in Kavanaugh hearing

That's cute. They think they're in the majority. Elections have consequences.

[scottinoc]

Mitch has been such a flake on so much, itns easy to reflexively cringe at him.

Mitch is not, I repeat NOT, a flake on judicial nominations.

[Phil DiBasquette]

Turtle Wax is his ancient Chinese secret

[Renegade]

Tell them to GFY!

[maxwellsmart_agent]

Based on what? For what reason? Just to obstruct?

[jazusamo]

Yep, #3...Obstructionism.

[upchuck]

From the article, with a minor edit:

Democrats wrote, “This nominee is being considered for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the country. If confirmed, he will have the opportunity to rule on issues of critical importance to all Americans for the next several decades. He may also be called upon to decide whether this president should face investigation or possible indictment for criminal wrongdoing.”

If the shoe were on the other foot, Republicans could write the same complaints about a liberal (shiver) nominee.

[Hardastarboard]

Clever post, clever screen name.