Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“The FBI only looked at 3000 of 675,000 Crooked Hillary Clinton Emails.” They purposely...
Real Donald Trump Twitter ^ | August 25, 2018 | President Donald Trump

Posted on 08/25/2018 8:37:07 AM PDT by SMGFan

“The FBI only looked at 3000 of 675,000 Crooked Hillary Clinton Emails.” They purposely didn’t look at the disasters. This news is just out. @FoxNews

9:11 AM - 25 Aug 2018


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: andrewmccabe; christopherwray; comeylies; crookedhillary; doit; fbicorrupt; hillaryemails; hillarysemails; jamesclapper; jamescomey; johnbrennan; leonpanetta; lisapage; perjury; peterstrzok; robertmueller; steeledossier; susanrice; trumptweet; weinerlaptop; weinerlaptopcoverup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: Guenevere

The tweeting is preparing us for what he will do, and why!

***********

I get what you’re saying but he’s been tweeting, talking and posturing for over a year. Meanwhile, many conservatives have pleaded with him to release the FISA docs and start firing people. Its past time for action.

Trump should go before the American people and present his case for declassifying the FISA docs, cleaning house at the FBI and DOJ, and terminating the endless Mueller witch hunt that went off the rails long ago. The American people are sick and tired of all this disruptive, partisan motivated nonsense and they will support him.

Its time to do something.


81 posted on 08/25/2018 3:06:10 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

If she got elected , there would have been NO emails looked at.


82 posted on 08/25/2018 3:08:07 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir_Humphrey

President Trump : If you want this to go away, then please DECLASSIFY EVERYTHING (except those that genuinely impact nat’l security).

******************

Yes, yes and YES! The FISA docs are the Rosetta Stone for this entire scandal and will reveal everything the Dems are desperately trying to hide.

His delays and reluctance to act are hurting him, but more importantly hurting the country. We need to know what went on so we can hold people accountable and prevent this kind of subversion from happening again in the future.


83 posted on 08/25/2018 3:09:09 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

I know, agree....
....but timing is everything....
....and I’m willing to wait just a little longer.


84 posted on 08/25/2018 3:49:49 PM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

Well said


85 posted on 08/25/2018 3:51:01 PM PDT by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative
You know, they are all under the assumption that she has a security clearance. I have read all of the biographies written about her and none of them ever mentioned that she went through a security clearance.

What if she has never had one to begin with?

86 posted on 08/25/2018 4:48:51 PM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

I don’t see how an SOS could function without a security clearance. They are constantly involved in security situations. Just think about Benghazi. You KNOW she had to have been all over secret info on that. And that’s just one example. In 2016, when her campaign was asked if she still had a security clearance, their reply was, “no comment”. That speaks volumes, IMHO.


87 posted on 08/26/2018 1:51:39 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative
If you were working in the White House as an agent whose job was to make sure everyone had their clearance and First Lady Hillary rebuffs you time and time again, and then she makes it difficult for you to secure her assistants, who do you complain to? Especially, when she has control of the people you work for.

I think that people just "took it for granted" that she had one, because she is who she is. Later, everyone just assumes that she had a security clearance all along. Presidents don't go through clearances, only their assistants. What do you do with a First Lady?

Anyone who has a top security clearance would know that it is illegal to put secrets on your personal computer. But, she missed that lesson cuz she never went through any training.

Laws are for peons.

88 posted on 08/26/2018 2:45:25 PM PDT by Slyfox (Not my circus, not my monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Anyone who has a top security clearance would know that it is illegal to put secrets on your personal computer. But, she missed that lesson cuz she never went through any training.

Laws are for peons.


I think she knew exactly what she was doing, knew it was illegal, like most things she does. She doesn’t care; she knows that the democrat cabal, or whatever cabal she’s a part of, will protect her. They always have. I think it’s the globalist cabal. But what do I know? (Actually I think only a handful of people know who and what this evil cabal is, and what they’re capable of).


89 posted on 08/26/2018 9:03:00 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Seem d implausible at the time that they’d looked at most.


90 posted on 08/27/2018 5:09:00 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

900 was like round 4 of the explanations. As I recall, the last posted number was 1300.


91 posted on 08/28/2018 10:40:37 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

Also keep in mind that the FBI sat on this for over a month, until they had to respond, and only then began the sham review.


92 posted on 08/28/2018 10:45:23 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

What is said in the article is largely correct. It also is utterly misleading.

One can find many things you are looking for very quickly with that kind of automation - but it won’t let you *reliably* find what you aren’t explicitly looking for. And if not done carefully, it can eliminate a lot of what you are looking for and needs to be verified and cross-checked.


93 posted on 08/28/2018 10:54:03 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Hillary had to go through the training multiple times, each as a Senator, then again as Secretary of State.

As I understand she did indeed sign the document where she certified that she understood the procedures, would take special care, and understood the penalties for revealing through either intent or carelessness.

She was very aware. It is a system designed that 17-year-olds off the street can follow it. She chose not to.


94 posted on 08/28/2018 11:10:50 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

People who have went through the anal exam in order to get their top clearances are mystified as to how Hillary was able to access secrets on her homemade server.


She had her staff copy from the secure system, and post into her home server. There’s even an e-mail where she explicitly instructs them to do this and strip the markings, then send it to her. IIRC, she was in Russia at the time.


95 posted on 08/28/2018 11:13:33 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Anyone who has a top security clearance would know that it is illegal to put secrets on your personal computer. But, she missed that lesson cuz she never went through any training.


When she applied to get her State Department e-mail on a Blackberry, she was denied. 5 of her staff members were briefed by the NSA in a day-long session exactly why she couldn’t get a waiver. She responded by having the server set up.

She was well aware. She lied repeatedly about her setup and devices. Even if she may not have understood the technology, she knew exactly what she was doing, and was detailed in her attempts to evade having her communications on a government record. She or her staff also had the State Department shut down the firewall for a time so her e-mails wouldn’t get caught in the SD security filters.


96 posted on 08/28/2018 11:23:38 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson