[Slyfox]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hanssen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldrich_Ames

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg

[Slyfox]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hanssen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldrich_Ames

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg

[Pearls Before Swine]

Clearly, the part below the line of asterisks isn’t from Wikipedia!

[deadrock]

The tricky bit is Robert Hanssen was not a political(Presidential candidate) adversary of a sitting President.

[ClearCase_guy]

I want Hillary in either Gitmo or SuperMax.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

It’s a staggering comparison/contrast betw Clinton and Hanssen. Of that there can be no doubt. The whole “intent” nuance which is not at all present in the legalese of the espionage statutes is paper thin, in light of the specific
“sensitive information” training HRC rec’d and the pledges she made before assuming office.

It’s infinitely galling that the smartest woman in the world cannot be held accountable for her own gross negligence. But this is actually prehensile to negligence: She was warned, repeatedly. Is/was it plausibly, really the case that nobody was unintimidated by her? Maybe not. Everybody knew with he certainty of a sunrise she would be president.

[minnesota_bound]

What is Donald Trump doing about this?
Tweeting and not acting.