Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN'S Love Letter for 'RBG'
Townhall.com ^ | August 31, 2018 | Brent Bozell and Tim Graham

Posted on 08/31/2018 10:28:52 AM PDT by Kaslin

If CNN really wanted to brand itself as a "Facts First" news channel, why did it promise to air a gushy documentary about fiercely feminist Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Labor Day weekend? In case you didn't know, this film is actually a production by "CNN Films," founded in 2012 to offer "distinguished, thought-provoking documentary programming to audiences on CNN's platforms around the world."

CNN's film "RBG" first premiered at the Sundance Film Festival in January, where the media fawned all over it, and her. Entertainment Weekly oozed: "Forget movie stars. The hottest celebrity at the Sundance Film Festival this weekend was Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg." Ginsburg's apparently iconic line is "All I ask of my brethren is that they take their feet off our necks."

That's an interesting line for the abortion-on-demand feminists.

Ginsburg appeared at the festival for an interview with none other than NPR Supreme Court reporter Nina Totenberg, who is Ginsburg's unofficial publicist at laudatory public events like this. Totenberg also gushes over her in the documentary, saying, "She's become such an icon." And in one interview, she said, "Ruth Bader Ginsburg did change the way the world is for American women."

The film's graphic carries the words "Hero. Icon. Dissenter." Couldn't the very same thing be said of former Justice Antonin Scalia? Or Justice Clarence Thomas? Not in a million years. It was Totenberg who tried to ruin Thomas with unproven sexual harassment charges.

Then CNN put "RBG" in the cinemas, and it grossed $13.9 million in #Resistance tickets, according to Box Office Mojo. Liberal newspapers called it a box-office "winner" almost immediately. In early May, Washington Post chief film critic Ann Hornaday gushed under this headline: "And the Summer Box Office's Big Winner Is ... Ruth Bader Ginsburg?" It grossed $560,000 in its first weekend. That's not exactly an "Avengers" opening, but what the hell.

In late August, USA Today film writer Bryan Alexander sized up the season's cinematic winners and losers and proclaimed that the "best new superhero duo" of the summer-movie season is Ginsburg and Mister Rogers. (A Rogers documentary, promoted by the liberals as a salve for Trump's tweets, grossed almost $22 million.)

Hollywood has also gotten into the act this year with insipid television tributes. In March, the ABC sitcom "Splitting Up Together" offered a plot about a doctor who told a divorced mother that her teenage boy should be encouraged to masturbate without shame, so she creates a "masturbation nook" for him with a picture of -- we kid you not -- Justice Ginsburg.

In April, the Fox sitcom "New Girl" wackily celebrated a "feminist-icons" birthday party theme for a 3-year-old girl named Ruth, named after ... Justice Ginsburg. The kiddies celebrate with pictures of Ginsburg, Eleanor Roosevelt, Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Just six days later, the CBS sitcom "Man with a Plan" featured a mom pushing on her little girl a Barbie doll that's ... Justice Ginsburg, because "She just has more important things to do than fix her hair." The daughter asks, "Where are her sparkles?" Mommy replies: "On her brain. Yeah. Ruth here has done a lot of important work for our country."

So it's not just CNN that feels compelled to roll up a block of marble to place under Justice Ginsburg. Next up is a more fictional movie "based on real events" titled "On the Basis of Sex" with "Star Wars" actress Felicity Jones playing young leftist Ginsburg. It's being distributed by Focus Features and owned by NBCUniversal. It's the latest bucket of evidence that the liberal media march in lockstep, both in "news" and entertainment.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: cnn; fnn; rbg

1 posted on 08/31/2018 10:28:52 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Look up at the Bench, it’s a Bird, it’s a Plane, it’s SUPERJEWESS!


2 posted on 08/31/2018 10:31:30 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (The way Liberals carry on about Deportation, you would think "Mexico" was Spanish for "Auschwitz".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I saw the advert for it, they had Gloria Steinham in it saying RBG was a “superhero”. Must not watch TV.


3 posted on 08/31/2018 10:31:39 AM PDT by TexasM1A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Their hero is a bitter old lady who enjoys the destruction of babies and putting international law over the US Constitution

An PS - she is not long for this world


4 posted on 08/31/2018 10:38:31 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasM1A

RBG is up against FOOTBALL !!!!
Great scheduling CNN but then again you were never smart just liars.


5 posted on 08/31/2018 10:39:38 AM PDT by Kozy (new age haruspex; "Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Should have named it FOB for Fugly Old Biytch.


6 posted on 08/31/2018 10:42:14 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Cynicism is the only refuge in a world that is determined to eliminate itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ahhh, but she was a cheer leader in HS! Go JMHS! Thanks loads for Ruthie, Chuckie and Bernie! Way to go! s/


7 posted on 08/31/2018 10:42:58 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (What is earned is treasured, what is free is worth what you paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In retrospect, I wonder why there wasn’t any controversy about her nomination to the Supreme Court...

A big part of her history was as general counsel for the ACLU. Yet this was completely ignored when Bill Clinton nominated her, and she was confirmed to the Supreme Court with little attention paid to her background.


8 posted on 08/31/2018 10:50:50 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Will they produce a puff piece about the life and times of Clarence Thomas? If we are lauding Supreme Court justices, why is she singled out for adulation?


9 posted on 08/31/2018 10:52:20 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
In retrospect, I wonder why there wasn’t any controversy about her nomination to the Supreme Court...

Has a Democrat-appointed justice ever been thoroughly critiqued?

10 posted on 08/31/2018 10:54:56 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Good point. No I don’t think any Democrat nominees are scrutinized.


11 posted on 08/31/2018 11:08:51 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for posting this. I tried to read it all, but my brain kept shutting down.


12 posted on 08/31/2018 5:48:03 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Here funeral will be bigger than McCains.


13 posted on 08/31/2018 5:52:07 PM PDT by morphing libertarian (Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson