Amy Dryden: Banned From Facebook For Sharing Truth About CNN’s Kavanaugh Investigation

Halsey News ^ | SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 | ALEX ROBERTS

[george76]

Facebook is currently doing everything in their power to protect CNN after they censored evidence that one of their producers, Scott Bronstein has been randomly calling people who used to attend school with Judge Brett Kavanaugh in an attempt to dig up dirt on the Supreme Court nominee that might be used to prevent his confirmation to the Supreme Court from taking place.

Mark Zuckerberg’s social media platform took things a step further when they not only censored the evidence, but they deleted all media articles related to the evidence that was presented by Amy Dryden and banned Amy Dryden herself from the social media platform.

In response to being banned by Facebook for the audio that she shared Amy Dryden tweeted “This is what happens when you post an actual recording of a CNN producer’s dirty journalism on Facebook. #banned So wrong!” Dryden felt the information that was contained in the video showing Bronstein calling random people from the Yale class of 1987 who may have known Judge Brett Kavanaugh was important enough for the rest of America to see. She apparently was right with this belief given the fact that liberal controlled Facebook has done everything possible to keep people from learning about the video and what took place.

...

Facebook took down the original post of this. It had nearly 150,000 views and 6,000+ shares. FB censoring conservatives again

[gaijin]

Stole his business idea

Stole all the shares from his BEST friend

Secretly sold users’ data

Stated in a confidential email to a friend that people who trust him are "dumb-f*cks".

Married in the community proprety state of California, the very day AFTER he took Facebook public.

Requested nude photos of users to “protect them against the risk of revenge porn”.

Secretly tried to get hospitals to release vast stores of patient data “so I can help cure diseases”.

Initially pursued total rights ownership of images uploaded to FB; if you'd been photoed as a happy youth with, say, a can of Coors then later got really famous, Zuck could be paid by Coors for zero work and YOUR old photo in a new ad while you, the centerpiece of the ad, would get NOTHING. Struck down after lengthy legal battles.

De-platformed numerous Conservatives because he didn't agree with their views, couldn't define hate-speech when asked by Congress.

Secretly requested banks give him his users' financial data, including transactions, so “my users can check their balances on my site."

Digitally permitted his housing advertisers to filter out customers whose search histories were strongly associated with terms like "handicapped" , "mobility scooter" and "guidedog".

Admonished that people "build bridges instead of walls", all while building walls around his Palo Alto homes and around the huge Kauai Estate he bought and then threw the Hawaiians off of.

Established a "trustworthiness index" for ALL his facebook users while disclosing it to none of them.

Altered FB algorithms to flag content from conservative publications as spam.

Revered Augustus Caesar, leader of Rome who assured 200 years of peace via harsh rule, possibly arranging the execution of his own grandson. On a wedding anniversary trip to Rome, Zuck gushed so effusively over sculptures and monuments dedicated to Augustus that his wife joked that three people, not two, were on their trip.

For years, Zuck traditionally closed high-level Facebook executive meetings by shouting, "DOMINATION..!", perhaps half-jokingly.

Proposed installation in the homes of FB users special Facebook cameras that would follow and monitor users around as they went about their private lives inside their homes. But the cameras, Zuckerberg assured, would come with privacy settings which Facebook would, like, totally respect, or something.

[spincaster]

IT’S ABOUT TIME TO DRAG ZUKERBURGER OUT TOO THE NEAREST TREE AND SHOW HIM HOW ROPE WORKS.

[silverleaf]

Bump

Why we the people need a free honest media

[Paladin2]

An Open InfoWar is on....

[Perseverando]

OK, I give up. Who’s Amy Dryden?

[george76]

Facebook blocked conservative Republican Elizabeth Heng for daring to show the truth / the horrors of Communism. = Khmer Rouge.. Heng’s parents arrived in the United States thirty-three years ago as penniless, legal political refugees from the Khmer Rouge..

Facebook doesn’t want Americans to learn the truth about Communist Genocides.

[robel]

Leftists control the media, they control universities, they control the justice dept, what’s next?

[Wuli]

It apears that maybe the post was taken down by FB, but Amy Dryden was not banned; her FB page is still up, so why is she claiming she was banned?

As to the video of the CNN producers phone call - a. there may be legal questions about how the video was obtained - if it’s real, or b. that the actual source of the video cannot be identified & its truth verified - is the caller who he says it is, was the call really made to whom the recording implies it is.

I would have trouble posting the video of the call as “fact”. It cannot be verified as true. It needs some independent verification. If I were running a “news” outfit, I find some independent evidence to verify the caller and the call before I “published” it. Maybe FB responded the same way.

Am I saying CNN would not do what Amy says she caught them doing? No. I am sure they are capable and motivated to to that sort of thing. I am only saying Amy needs more to authenticate what she claims about the recorded call.

[george76]

Like the independent journalist Laura Loomer.

https://twitter.com/amy_vadc

[willyd]

Facebook cannot take the position that they are just a platform and not responsible for the content on their site and then do stuff like this... they are either responsible for all of it... or they don’t take sides.

[JimRed]

No defense of CNN intended, but isn’t that part of investigative reporting? Sure, they didn’t do it for Obama, so their motives are clearly partisan, but the procedure is not a problem. And without those double standards, they’d have NO standards at all!

[Yosemitest]

Read this:

Whoa.
Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans say they have spoken to two men who think they, not Kavanaugh, had the 1982 encounter that formed the basis for her sexual abuse claim.
(These tables are from a timeline the committee majority published 15 minutes ago.)

[JimRed]

Re: Post 12- refers to this part of the article:

Facebook is currently doing everything in their power to protect CNN after they censored evidence that one of their producers, Scott Bronstein has been randomly calling people who used to attend school with Judge Brett Kavanaugh in an attempt to dig up dirt on the Supreme Court nominee that might be used to prevent his confirmation to the Supreme Court from taking place.

To which I replied: No defense of CNN intended, but isn’t that part of investigative reporting? Sure, they didn’t do it for Obama, so their motives are clearly partisan, but the procedure is not a problem. And without those double standards, they’d have NO standards at all!

[george76]

The slow walk thru the Institutions was started by the 1930’s Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci ... the Fabian socialists have been increasingly successful at poisoning the roots of Western Civilization.

Antonio Gramsci was like the German “Frankfurt School” of international socialists who transplanted their vision to Columbia University. They understood that international socialism’s goals could not be fully accomplished until the strong edifice of Western Civilization was hollowed out and sabotaged from within.

America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within. ~ Joseph Stalin

[tcrlaf]

The censorship is on full display now, they aren’t even trying to hide it.

The Algos they blame are designed to be manipulated by the Left by complaints.

[Wuli]

I agree they are and can be prejudiced about which posts they do due diligence on and which they ignore.

That said, I am not convinced she, Amy, has done HER due diligence on the recording, at least not that she has offered any evidence of outside of the recording itself, which may, or may not be a recording of the person it is claimed to be.

[george76]

Facebook rescinded the ban. Because conservatives complained in mass.

[Perseverando]

Thanks!

[The Sons of Liberty]

IT’S ABOUT TIME TO DRAG ZUKERBURGER OUT TOO THE NEAREST TREE AND SHOW HIM HOW ROPE WORKS.

As a "Facebook Jail" ex-con I wholeheartedly agree!