Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC News: ‘All-Male Majority’ of Supreme Court Overturning Roe v. Wade ‘Would Not Be Legitimate’
Washington Free Beacon ^ | 09/28/18

Posted on 09/29/2018 12:46:08 PM PDT by Liberty7732

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Liberty7732

The libs try to make it all about abortion, but I think that’s just a smoke screen. There’s something way deeper going on here.

As I posted on another thread:

I’m convinced by now that their objections to Supreme Court nominees on the basis of Roe vs. Wade or “LGBTQ rights” are just cover. They know repealing Roe is HIGHLY unlikely, and would require years of wrangling. That’s not their big fear.

The Supreme Court being the last body that can grant you clemency before the lethal injection is administered might have something to do with people who have been plotting an overthrow of the government being somewhat concerned that the makeup of the court is not on their side.

THAT fear seems more likely to me.


21 posted on 09/29/2018 12:58:27 PM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

This nomination has very little do with abortion rights. The Marxists are using women as a cover up. It has Everything to do with abolishing the Second Amendment and taking over the country and abolishing the need for elections.


22 posted on 09/29/2018 12:58:48 PM PDT by Safetgiver (Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

Well I hate to notify ABC and the rest of the DNC/DSA MSM, but as soon as one single state passes a law it becomes a States Rights Issue, the Insurance Companies will deal with each State, and their premises will be MOOT. It is my great hope that this will be the financial and personal responsibility of the person having the abortion; then the right to choose becomes clearly a personal choice, and not financed by taxpayers.


23 posted on 09/29/2018 12:59:04 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
The Supreme Court that handed that ruling down was entirely male.

Right - so I guess Roe V Wade is not legitimate. Cool, that was easy.

24 posted on 09/29/2018 1:00:05 PM PDT by Shethink13 (there are 0 electoral votes in the state of denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: youthphil

Exactly correct.

If/when this scenario comes to be, the majority opinion should start off saying that, on the days of oral arguments and the subsequent writeup, the majority were female that day. The SCOTUS clerks (who do much of the heavy lifting) all self-identified as female as well.


25 posted on 09/29/2018 1:00:45 PM PDT by C210N (Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Thad McCotter has a spot-on article about the left ignoring the rule of law should Kavanugh be confirmed. https://amgreatness.com

It's scary and sickening because its completely conceivable that dems will void the rule of law whenever they feel like. (much like now, granted)

Bottom line; this must be stopped. Dems must be removed from elected office. Sanity must return to the courts where this type of crap would be thrown out of court from the get-go.

In fact, it's not too early to make this "rule of law" a campaign issue beginning tomorrow., one that we can win.

26 posted on 09/29/2018 1:00:49 PM PDT by chiller (Race is irrelevant in these United States; just shades of skin color)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
The Supreme Court that handed that ruling down was entirely male.

Poor Harry Blackmun.

He was just hard of hearing. It was a woman's right to SHOES, and he messed it all up.

27 posted on 09/29/2018 1:03:08 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Roe v. Wade was a judicial travesty!

Right to Privacy? 14th Amendment? REALLY?

Associate Justice Blackmun wrote the Majority Opinion, and afterwards admitted it was NOT based on precedent!

R v W should have never been heard by SCOTUS, (IMO) and ‘Roe’ has stated publicly that she was deceived by her legal team - yet, we now have “pro-choice”, organizations who loudly proclaim, “Infanticide is my Constitutional Right in the name of Female Reproductive Health Care!”

P.S.: “Roe” has been for many years a staunch ant-abortionist...


28 posted on 09/29/2018 1:03:09 PM PDT by heterosupremacist (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

It is obvious that they are wargaming the first adverse court majority since 1937, and what they are going to do is what we should have been doing all along - refuse and resist.


29 posted on 09/29/2018 1:04:16 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Six a.m. day after Christmas
I throw some clothes on in the dark
The smell of cold
Car seat is freezing
The world is sleeping
I am numb

Up the stairs to her apartment
She is balled up on the couch
Her mom and dad went down to Charlotte
They’re not home to find us out

And we drive
Now that I have found someone
I’m feeling more alone
Than I ever have before

She’s a brick and I’m drownin’ slowly
Off the coast and I’m headed nowhere
She’s a brick and I’m drownin’ slowly

They call her name at seven-thirty
I pace around the parking lot
And I walk down to buy her flowers
And sell some gifts that I got

Can’t you see
It’s not me you’re dying for
Now she’s feeling more alone
Then she ever has before

She’s a brick and I’m drownin’ slowly
Off the coast and I’m headed nowhere
She’s a brick and I’m drownin’ slowly

As weeks went by
It showed that she was not fine
They told me, “Son it’s time to tell the truth,” and
She broke down and I broke down
Cause I was tired of lying

Driving back to her apartment
For the moment we’re alone
Yeah she’s alone
And I’m alone
Now I know it

She’s a brick and I’m drownin’ slowly
Off the coast and I’m headed nowhere
She’s a brick and I’m drownin’ slowly

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wt5EHAqhR1c


30 posted on 09/29/2018 1:04:25 PM PDT by Zeneta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732
Ummm... SCOTUS had an all-male majority in deciding Roe... so I guess Roe v Wade is now illegitimate, right?

Lefties are sooooo easy to beat in debates these days.

31 posted on 09/29/2018 1:04:36 PM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Oh, yeah; never mind that the “law” that would be getting overturned is not even a law, and is just a ruling that has been “interpreted” as law.

Roe v Wade cannot be overturned as law, since it’s not law. The Roe v Wade ruling can be ruled unconstitutional, but then, it was unconstitutional from the beginning.


32 posted on 09/29/2018 1:05:25 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneRainbow68

An ABC Scare tactic aimed the 2 sisters RvW will not be overturned bastards


33 posted on 09/29/2018 1:06:13 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

So.....Based on that ridiculous assertion I guess the Constitution of the US is not legitimate?


34 posted on 09/29/2018 1:10:06 PM PDT by mosaicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Needs highlighting.. The Supreme Court that handed that ruling down was entirely male.
35 posted on 09/29/2018 1:10:08 PM PDT by goodnesswins (White Privilege EQUALS Self Control & working 50-80 hrs/wk for 40 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732
ABC News: ‘All-Male Majority’ of Supreme Court Overturning Roe v. Wade ‘Would Not Be Legitimate’

An All-Born Majority on the SC giving us Roe v. Wade was illegitimate.

36 posted on 09/29/2018 1:11:07 PM PDT by FreeReign (Rudy: Sessions is recused from everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Any woman nominated by Trump would be torn apart.

Since the liberals are so focused on sex, my guess is that she would be said to have been a slut.

And now that we have set the bar so low, that we are going back to high school now, any such woman nominee will be called a whore. They will produce men to testify they went on dates with her where she “put out” to smear her .


37 posted on 09/29/2018 1:11:11 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

ABC “news” has never been credible.


38 posted on 09/29/2018 1:11:37 PM PDT by Newtoidaho (All I ask of living is to have no chains on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Newsies are so adept at fabricating news that they think they can fabricate law, as well.


39 posted on 09/29/2018 1:13:46 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty7732

Yes, yes it would be.

May as well go for taking down the 19th Amendment as well.


40 posted on 09/29/2018 1:15:51 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Goong Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson