[frog in a pot]

At the same time, they think the GOP should have given ample time to investigate these claims, not establishing an artificial deadline.

Turley is always an interesting read, but I didn't go to the article and do not know who or how many is the "they" above.

In any event, the measure of "ample time" is a function of the credibility of the claims, with an overall deadline for claims. (In that regard, every deadline is artificial and it is surprising that attorneys would use that word in this context.)

With any other format, Dems could literally paralyze the confirmation process with a new list of claims whenever needed.

[Tuketu]

JMO But the lack of "adequate time" is attributable to the DEMs failure to request vetting by the FBI in July. Then again, they allege Dr Fraud wanted to remain in the shadows. So:
1. There was adequate time frittered away by the i(D)iots.
2. The Senators themselves could have initiated the investigation through:
(A) the FBI or (2) their own investigators.
Other than wreaking a travesty upon a (R) SCOTUS nominee (& family), and a (D) female with mental problems (IHMO) it is all political theater, in hopefully, a vain attempt to gain/keep power.

[Tuketu]

JMO But the lack of "adequate time" is attributable to the DEMs failure to request vetting by the FBI in July. Then again, they allege Dr Fraud wanted to remain in the anonymous (shattered by leaks). So:
1. There was adequate time frittered away by the i(D)iots.
2. The Senators themselves could have initiated the investigation through:
(A) the FBI or (2) their own investigators.
Other than wreaking a travesty upon a (R) SCOTUS nominee (& family), and a (D) female with mental problems (IHMO) it is all political theater, in hopefully, a vain attempt to gain/keep power.