Posted on 10/03/2018 3:27:42 PM PDT by Magnatron
Senate Democrats suggested in a new letter Wednesday to the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee that past FBI background checks on Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh include evidence of inappropriate behavior — claims quickly refuted by Republicans as “baseless innuendo.”
The letter — signed by eight of the 10 Democrats on the committee — provides no specifics to back up the Democrats’ assertion that Kavanaugh’s past background checks included such evidence. But the letter challenged the accuracy of a tweet from the committee’s Republican staff on Tuesday that read: “Nowhere in any of these six FBI reports, which the committee has reviewed on a bipartisan basis, was there ever a whiff of ANY issue — at all — related in any way to inappropriate sexual behavior or alcohol abuse.”
The Democrats said the information in the tweet is “not accurate,” urging the GOP to correct them.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
This is why Fineswine wants to keep the report secret, so she can LIE about what is in it.
So the dems have YET ANOTHER operative in the FBI giving them information/ammo.
Yeah, the inappropriate behavior must’ve been the reason why he was given access to the nuclear codes...
They are reduced to flinging mud on the wall to see what sticks.
New one must have nothing new if they’re already pointing to previous background checks which they’ve had forever.
Bingo!
Lie their asses off, knowing they wouldn't be released.
But then PDJT released them.
History could be repeated.
Only signed by 8 of 10 Dems...
Let’s look at their background checks. I’m pretty sure we’d find a lot worse than inappropriate behaviour. In some cases, a whole lot worse (China spy).
“So the dems have YET ANOTHER operative in the FBI giving them information/ammo.”
—
Isn’t from the 6 FBI investigations he’s already been through and all the judiciary have been knowledgeable about? If they are those already done six checks, there were no red flags raised at all.
“New one must have nothing new if they’re already pointing to previous background checks which they’ve had forever.”
—
Yup.
So why didn’t they bring it up in the past month or so?
If the FBI finds there is nothing more to the allegations, the Dems will of course turn on the FBI and say the previous 6 investigations were eye-wash jobs that didn’t look at his drinking problem and it should now be further investigated, A 24 year veteran of the FBI was asked this morning what they follow up on and he said witnesses who had been identified, They don’t care if someone drinks beer, They are looking for reasons he might be blackmailed if he’s accepted for a Federal job.
Keep digging. They 35% of the country who wake up everyday hating Trump first thing in the morning will hate him even more. The rest of the country grows more and more disgusted with you.
Let her lie and the open the report.
If true, why were thest not brought forward during the Senate hearing?
If there had been the DemonRats would have brought them up before. They are lying. They always lie.
IKR? These folks need their heads examined.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.