Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How John Roberts will manage the Supreme Court's conservative majority
CNN ^ | 10/8/18 | Joan Biskupic

Posted on 10/08/2018 9:32:08 AM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: monkeybrau

*say


21 posted on 10/08/2018 9:56:25 AM PDT by monkeybrau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Roberts is worrisome. His decision on Obamacare is probably my single most hated SCOTUS decision in the last decade at least. Just absolutely horrible.


22 posted on 10/08/2018 9:57:51 AM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bk1000
the swing vote thing.
. . . has always been the hope to which the minority clings.

There will always be cases in which not all conservatives agree - but in my adult lifetime that phenomenon has always been dominated by the “swing vote” of people like O’Connor and Kennedy.

Wouldn’t you just love to be able to see Antonin Scalia seeing this court today!


23 posted on 10/08/2018 10:02:34 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Journalism promotes itself - and promotes big government - by speaking ill of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs

Which Fraud are you talking about?

If they were blackmailing Roberts over his kids adoption, and his kids being grown nullifies that, then Roberts may be in the mood for payback.


24 posted on 10/08/2018 10:02:42 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

It took an Amendment to tax income ... but taxing not complying with a federal rule?

But, you know, fines require due process so call it a tax and none of that guff.


25 posted on 10/08/2018 10:03:46 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Behind the Blue Wall
He wants to be the next Kennedy and that vote certainly set him up for stepping into those shoes. But my question is why would you want to?
26 posted on 10/08/2018 10:04:32 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Obamacare was clearly outside the scope of the US Constitution and Bill of Rights yet Justice Roberts did backflips, contortions, and double jointed slithery to justify it.

I will never assume Roberts is either a constitutionalist or right wing. I simply don’t trust him to do the right thing.


27 posted on 10/08/2018 10:04:56 AM PDT by Boomer (Cheers to the Triump of the Trump Admin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Yep - and one must wonder if he is wimpy enough to have caved to a dem barrage of threats while on a left-leaning SCOTUS....would love for Gorsuch to end up in his seat...


28 posted on 10/08/2018 10:26:10 AM PDT by trebb (So many "experts" with so little experience in what they preach....even here...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Boomer

Roberts is comprised


29 posted on 10/08/2018 10:26:26 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

“Which Fraud are you talking about?”

The leftists’ god Obama that currently identifies as a man.


30 posted on 10/08/2018 10:29:26 AM PDT by treetopsandroofs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The left has its ways. If he becomes the swing vote, he will be lionized in the press, by the legal profession and academy, and in the history books as a great man of “principle, intellect and courage”. Speaking fees into the hundreds of thousands, fawning profiles in all of the most influential publications, etc., etc. Or he can end up like Scalia . . .


31 posted on 10/08/2018 10:35:13 AM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Probably badly.


32 posted on 10/08/2018 10:41:25 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Like I need a CNN opinion.
I love the smell of burning hair in the morning.


33 posted on 10/08/2018 11:07:02 AM PDT by hadaclueonce ( This time I am Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

It’s easy, just don’t Lead them as much


34 posted on 10/08/2018 11:08:26 AM PDT by hadaclueonce ( This time I am Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

CNN hoping that Roberts can save the Left. I’m not a student of the court, but we do know that the Obamacare ruling was troubling.


35 posted on 10/08/2018 11:10:26 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I agree. Roberts does want to be the next Kennedy. He knows that if he becomes the wild card, everyone on the left is going to put him in the spotlight and applaud his “bravery”, “independence”, “wisdom”. If he votes lockstep with the other 4 on the right, he’ll be vilified by the left. President Trump needs to replace Ginsburg (and hopefully Breyer) to ensure a true conservative majority. Roberts cannot be trusted.


36 posted on 10/08/2018 11:20:05 AM PDT by littleharbour ("You take on the intel community they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you" C. Schumer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; All
When one side, Conservatives, revere the Constitution and the rule of law, and the other side, Progressives, disdain the Constitution and the rule of law, there is bound to be conflict.

Any court that tries to be *in the middle* of that, is going to be constantly violating the Constitution.

37 posted on 10/08/2018 11:22:31 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The Chief Justice doesn’t have any real power, except the power to designate who writes the opinion for the Court. And even that is constrained since it’s obviously got to be someone who’s in the majority.


38 posted on 10/08/2018 12:10:10 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cnsmom

He wouldnt hear certain important cases because he knew Kennedy would vote with Ginsburg.

Now, we will see which cases they take and decline.


39 posted on 10/08/2018 12:12:11 PM PDT by Tea Party Terrorist (A bad peace is better than a good war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

When Ruthie gives it up it won’t matter what Roberts does. In six years any number of justices could leave....all will be replaced by conservatives!!!


40 posted on 10/08/2018 12:15:39 PM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson