Replies

While I would like to believe this, I have no facts with which to back this argument. The history of conservatives in general and the GOP in particular is that they always cave, always give in, and never, ever fight back no matter what.

Want to flood the country for decades with tens of millions of illiterate unassimilatable dependent third world peasants with the specific intent to negate our votes? No problem. Institutionsalize discrimination against us based on sex and ethnicity in hiring and college admissions? Fine with us. Give away the European countries we spent blood and treasure saving from the Nazis in WWII to the godless Muslims? Not a peep will be said by us. Militarize the cops and courts and turn them into a weapon to be used against is? That’s fine. Legislate creeping gun control? No worries. Weaponize the IRS against us then hide records and lie about it? That’s cool, too. Shoot us while we are at baseball practice, drive us out of restaurants, expose our private info on the internet... yawn.

I could do on, but my point is that in my lifetime I’ve never seen any GOP or conservative resistance to anything the communists have done. Not one single thing. I think this is wishful thinking, though I hope I am wrong. Every day we get smaller and weaker while the dependent hordes they import grow larger and stronger.

To paraphrase Churchill if you will not fight when the chances of winning are high and the cost is low there may well come a time when you are forced to fight when the chances of winning are low and the costs are high, or worse.

Maybe we should be “baiting” them into the behavior, so we will be the ones prepared to respond to it, appropriately.

They vandalize our Trump-stickered bait car, they get a beat down. They assault us at rallies, they get bear spray. And we can always “out” some of them as being conservative, causing them to eat their own. Can that bearing of false witness be more forgivable than theirs at the Kavanaugh hearings?

The disruption, violence and intimidation tactics of the left have been increasing dramatically since the American people chose Donald Trump as President.

I walk my dog, twice a day, I carry, always, some times two pieces.

Many in the neighborhood are demonRATs {yard signs}, know that I'm a Trumper, {signs, hats, shirts, dog wearing a Trump sweater} and we all are cordial.

Some times I have opened carried with a Smith & Wesson 357 Magnum so these is no confusion.

Read this excerpt:

... 4. ‘Start Enforcing Criminal Law’ One thing that turned the Kavanaugh confirmation process into a circus was the protesters who stormed into buildings on Capitol Hill, cornering senators and sometimes shouting insults and threats, said Sidney Powell, a former federal prosecutor in Texas. “There is no bottom to how low the Democrats will go to promote their agenda,” Powell told The Daily Signal. “The behavior of protesters was horrible and offensive. It should not be allowed in office buildings. They are showing their true colors and they are painfully ugly. They are digging their own graves.” But this goes beyond a political problem, said J. Christian Adams, a former Justice Department lawyer, asserting that the threats and interruptions of Senate business amount to a federal crime. “These are not protesters. It’s a crime to disrupt the U.S. Senate,” Adams told The Daily Signal. “The U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Jessie Liu, needs to start enforcing criminal law.” “If the law isn’t enforced, it’s going to keep happening and get worse. It won’t stop at the Senate; they’ll disrupt the Supreme Court, too,” Adams said. Such behavior is punishable upon conviction by a maximum of six months in prison, he said. Adams referred to U.S. Code 4, Section 5104, which says in part: Violent entry and disorderly conduct. —An individual or group of individuals may not willfully and knowingly … enter or remain in the gallery of either House of Congress in violation of rules governing admission to the gallery adopted by that House or pursuant to an authorization given by that House … with the intent to disrupt the orderly conduct of official business … utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede, disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress[.]