Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gumdrop

It is traditional for the Senate to defer to the wishes of local senators when appointing Federal judges through the “blue slip” process in which senators are given a veto over judges appointed to Federal appeals courts in their state. This is McConnell’s big fat F-U to not-so-Fine-Stein and Harris.

It’s not even subtle. These are not establishment Republican Bushites, these are all male members of the Federalist Society. Paleoconservative red meat.

So much for civility. Not-so-finestine and Harris have expended all their political capital, no one will listen to their whining over this.


14 posted on 10/12/2018 2:34:11 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Schumer delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“So much for civility. Not-so-finestine and Harris have expended all their political capital, no one will listen to their whining over this.”

Now if we can hold the Senate for 6 more years, we might be able to finally end left wing judicial activism.


59 posted on 10/12/2018 5:08:49 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Proud member of the DWN party. (Deplorable Wing Nut))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

In the last 100 years, only two chairman of the past 18 chairmen (Eastland and Leahy) have adopted policies requiring two positive blue slips as a prerequisite for committee consideration of judicial nominations
Previous Republican and Democratic chairmen, including Senators Edward Kennedy and Joe Biden, held hearings on nominees without both blue slips.
The blue slip is not enshrined in any Senate or committee rule. Rather, it is a courtesy that has been applied based on the chairman’s prerogative since it was created in 1917...nip...On the other hand, some have argued that the blue-slip courtesy has no place in modern judicial confirmations. The L.A. Times recently suggested getting rid of the blue slip, as did the New York Times several years ago.

Even our Committee’s Ranking Member, Senator Feinstein, once advocated abolishing the blue slip. I disagree that we should abolish the blue slip.

The blue slip serves the important purpose of encouraging consultation between the White House and the Senate. The White House has an obligation to engage in good-faith consultation with home-state senators. I won’t allow the White House to just steamroll home-state senators. But, as I’ve said all along, I won’t allow the blue slip process to be abused.

I won’t allow senators to prevent a Committee hearing for political or ideological reasons. Using the blue slip for these purposes is not consistent with historical practice.

https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-maintain-historical-blue-slip-courtesy

My take on the 9th District court confirmation yesterday & the 3 just out of Committee waiting for the Senate’s return is that Feinstein is not going to be afforded undue courtesy after her recent actions re Kavanaugh.


65 posted on 10/12/2018 5:22:39 AM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson