Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shut Up, They Explain ^ | October 17, 2018 | John Stossel

Posted on 10/17/2018 6:21:56 AM PDT by Kaslin

Gloria Alvarez, the young woman from Guatemala I wrote about last week, just got blocked by Facebook. Why? Because she criticizes socialism.

After Alvarez joined me in my American studio to make a video we titled "Socialism Fails Every Time," she flew to Mexico City to make a speech.

A few days later she wrote me that "some leftist 'students' posted on a fanpage called 'Marxist and Leninist Memes': 'BOYCOTT Gloria Alvarez in our University! We won't let her in!'"

So Alvarez posted (in Spanish) on her own Facebook page: "My dear Mexican socialists intolerants: Thank you! for trying to boycott my event... showing that panic that you have for the debate of ideas. Given yours are so bad, that only with bullets they can be obeyed just like in Venezuela and Nicaragua. You demonstrate once again that you are the intolerant ones against freedom."

She ended her riff with a wise defense of free speech: "Where words are exchanged, bullets are no longer exchanged."

Then her account was blocked.

"You recently posted something that violates Facebook policies," wrote Facebook.

What violated Facebook policies? Was it calling the people who demanded that she not be allowed to speak "socialists intolerants" whose ideas "are so bad that only with bullets they can be obeyed"?

When social media companies block you, the reason is often mysterious.

Facebook did say, "For more information, visit the Help Center... (U)nderstand Facebook's Community Standards." Good luck getting an explanation that way.

Alvarez suspects she was blocked because her opponents, boycott advocates, complained about her. Leftists are good at launching campaigns to shut people up.

Fortunately, Alvarez has connections. A few days later she wrote, "a friend of mine that has a cousin working on Facebook Latin America (helped) me to unblock my page this morning."


Except, most of us don't have a friend whose cousin works for Facebook.

Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and other social media platforms promote themselves as sites that enhance communication, not censor it.

I shouldn't use the word "censor." When a private company blocks someone, it's called editing. Companies edit to increase civil communication, improve the quality of discussion, delete threats and lies, etc. Editing helps make their sites more pleasant places to visit.

Censorship and the First Amendment apply to governments. America's Founders feared government censorship because government can use force, and we have just one government.

But if Facebook blocks me, I still can communicate via Twitter, my YouTube videos or Instagram.

But wait. Facebook bought Instagram. And Google bought YouTube. If these big companies edit me out, it will be hard to reach people.

Conservatives claim social media companies are quicker to censor conservative speech. That's probably true. The people who work for social media companies lean left. Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey admitted that, telling CNN, "We need to constantly show that we are not adding our own bias, which I fully admit is more left-leaning."

That's why conservative sites like PragerU have been limited by YouTube. Restricting Prager University's videos is absurd. The site has millions of followers. It offers dignified lectures on conservative philosophy. They explain things my Princeton professors never taught me.

The lectures violate neither YouTube's standards nor Facebook's standards. But recently, PragerU discovered that some of its Facebook videos were watched by no one. Zero people.

Facebook later apologized, saying someone flagged PragerU's videos as "hate speech," and at least one Facebook human "content monitor" agreed. He was being "retrained," said Facebook.

Good luck with that.

Right-winger Alex Jones was banned by all major social media platforms. Milo Yiannopoulos was banned by Twitter.

But I haven't seen enough data to convince me that the sites actively limit conservative speech alone. Facebook just deleted 800 political pages, including some that criticize police brutality.

Leftist Glenn Greenwald tweeted after that purge, "Those who demanded Facebook & other Silicon Valley giants censor political content ... are finding that content that they themselves support & like end up being repressed. That's what has happened to every censorship advocate in history."

The best answer to speech we don't like is: more speech.

I like being able to hear numerous opinions -- even if I disagree with them.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: socialmedia

1 posted on 10/17/2018 6:21:56 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion; Sarah Barracuda


2 posted on 10/17/2018 6:36:13 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m just guessing here, but I think “Where words are exchanged, bullets are no longer exchanged.” could have been disingenuously reported as a threat.

3 posted on 10/17/2018 6:37:46 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I worship our Big Tech noble leaders to tell me what is right. From the tall bald buy to the goofy kid.

Big Tech please, I need your approval. I want it. /s

4 posted on 10/17/2018 6:42:55 AM PDT by TheNext (Anonymous Source)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Editing” is emerging as a principal business tool among social media providers. This is hardly surprising considering where their biggest potential market is (China) and the the western Left/Liberal preference to silence instead of engaging in dialogue. Definitely not democracy-friendly.

Yeah, probably time to break them and impose some public utility type rules on content management. Slim chance of Congressional action considering the amounts of money they are being bribed with.

5 posted on 10/17/2018 6:55:05 AM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The problem is the “reporting” process and feature. Far too many who are dishonestly abusing it to persecute others without any real justification.

These “false reportings” should be punished just as sternly, If an account falsely reports a post the accuser should be banned for the false report.

It is currently one sided and wide open for abusive action as it is.

6 posted on 10/17/2018 6:56:15 AM PDT by Openurmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Amazon banned me from making reviews for giving less than total love for a fake product - took almost a year to have that privilege reinstated. No longer do I pimp nor warn of products there.

7 posted on 10/17/2018 7:03:14 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouieFisk

Lol. I ended up in fb jail for a post whereI had deliberately did not capitalize the “c” in coons name after a disgusting comment he made. It really doesn’t take much.

8 posted on 10/17/2018 8:19:28 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

That’s FB for you!

9 posted on 10/17/2018 8:25:43 AM PDT by LouieFisk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson