Skip to comments.Was Senate race in Montana rigged?
Posted on 11/08/2018 5:56:34 AM PST by OldCorps
I woke up yesterday at around 0500 EST and looked at the election results. At that time Rosendale(R) was ahead of Tester(D) in the Montana race for the US Senate seat. I checked back at around 0730 and Rosendale was still ahead by several thousand votes with something like 94% of the precincts reporting. I then look again at around 1100 and Tester had been declared the victor?
The MSM has learned not to publicize this stuff so they dont get a rush of indignant citizens.
Libs can print/stuff ballots faster than they can pick your pocket.
They have years of experience at doing it.
Sit down, shut up and don’t ask any questions. The media says that’s how it is so that’s how it is.
Designated “Democrat Fraud Precincts” delay reporting votes until the end so that they know how many votes need to be manufactured.
As is the AZ Senate race, where they are manufacturing votes in Phoenix.
They got caught red handed during Bush/Gore.
How does it happen that dems are always in charge of this stuff?
"It doesn't matter who votes - what matters is who counts the votes."
Same trick in Wisconsin got radical socialist Evers elected governor.
Thats how he was elected the first time.
Theres a video of Montana Democrat Governor Brian Schweitzer telling a meeting of lawyers that he kept the polls open long enough for the Democrats to create enough fake ballots at the Indian Reservations and the Democrat stronghold of Butte for Tester to win.
Now, Schweitzer has a mansion on Georgetown Lake.
Great American, old Brian.
My BIL always said The man with the pencil wins. It is always Dems and always newly discovered votes.
the large democrat districts wait until the end to report, then make sure they have enough votes to win
they only need to do this in 57 out of some 3000 districts
A lot of this seems like emotional kneejerk reaction, but it still raises the ugly specter of the fact that there is no system of voter identity validation. One citizen=one vote is not voter supression. In every other civil or bureaucratic process there are systems of evaluation and validation. This all opens the door for people to speculate about fraud. They could close the door on it by allowing audits on accuracy.
Hell, I got a letter in the mail a few months ago from the state bureau of motor vehicles saying i was randomly selected to prove that I am insured. This, even though I strongly suspect they have ways to check driver’s coverage state electronically.
Why is it always so hard to do anything fraudulently with the government, except casting a ballot?
I think he had been in Montana for 16 years, hadnt he?? How long do you have to live somewhere before you are no longer considered a carpetbagger? (Not that the Dems care about that...with Hillary buying a house in Chappaqua and running for the senate before they were settled there!) Or was his residence there just his second home?
We need an army of poll watchers and lawyers for every close race.
Look at the kind of stuff democrats were wiling to do to Kavanaugh...
Look at the thugs outside of Tucker’s house ...
And you’ll know these people will do anything.
And yes, even the nice ones I knew when I was younger were ‘in’ on doing voter fraud.
Sadly, it doesn’t look like Trump’s coattails weren’t enough for WV or MT....
WV a weak as snot GOP candidate didn’t help.
Tester should have lost, if only for his disgraceful fake sabotaging of Jackson.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.