VICTIM’S FATHER OUTRAGED After Parkland School Killer is Allowed to Vote

The Gateway Pundit ^ | November 10, 2018 | Cristina Laila

[metmom]

This is beyond disgusting.

Anyone involved in this should lose their job and face jail time themselves.

There are some crimes that should strip people of their right to vote for life.

[JoSixChip]

It’s unfortunate, but until he is convicted he is not a felon. If you were not allowed to vote anytime you are accused, the dems would have us all accused of something right before every election.

[OttawaFreeper]

Really shows who Sheriff Israel really is about. I’d have more confidence in ones like Barney Fife and Deputy Perkins (from Lobo) than I would Israel.

[JoSixChip]

There are some crimes that should strip people of their right to vote for life.

Is the accusation enough, or should we wait until he is convicted. Maybe we should go ahead and execute him without even a trial?

[SunkenCiv]

I've now become offended that the whiny gun-grabbing a-holes are allowed to vote..

[donozark]

Rosco P. Coltrane comes to mind as well.

[William Tell]

"Is the accusation enough, ..."

The same Democrats who would have denied Kavanaugh a seat on the Supreme Court exert themselves to register people to vote who are awaiting trial for mass murder.

If not for double standards the Democrats would have no standards at all.

[eyeamok]

Isn’t Florida letting Foreign national invaders vote already? Obviously All Criminals have a say in society and can vote there.

[Zeppo]

Looking at the constituencies that form the core of the Democratic Party’s power base, it’s eminently clear that ‘criminals’ (whether not yet accused, currently awaiting trial, or actually convicted) constitute a vastly important interest group to which the party caters...

[Jacquerie]

When a jury of fellow citizens determines a certain citizen belongs in a cage, that person is no longer a member of society and should not be privileged with the political right to vote.

[JoSixChip]

If not for double standards the Democrats would have no standards at all.

I fully agree with you that it is ugly. My point is just that he is not yet a convicted felon.

[Lite]

Well, either we are for the rule of law, or we are democrats. As emotionally disturbing as it may be, this sos is still legally allowed to vote.

A good example/reason for a speedy trial and sentence. (And execution of sentence.)

[Hugh the Scot]

I don’t believe anyone legitimately questions his guilt in this matter.

[Ancesthntr]

While I am utterly disgusted by both this guy voting and by Scott Israel, there is a simple rule at play here:

No conviction = any person accused of any crime(s) cannot be denied their right to vote.

Perhaps people should be more pissed off that there hasn’t yet been a trial that almost certainly would result in a conviction and some elements of justice.

[Reno89519]

Well, he hasn’t been convicted yet. Even once executed, they’ll keep him registered and voting.

[JoSixChip]

I don’t believe anyone legitimately questions his guilt in this matter.

Nor do I, still there is a process that must be followed.

[\/\/ayne]

True, but it shows how far Despicable Democrats will go to score a vote. Questions abound - did someone put money into his jail commissary account?

[Ancesthntr]

“I don’t believe anyone legitimately questions his guilt in this matter.”

---

You are correct. However, until he is ACTUALLY convicted, what we think or know is utterly meaningless. What is so difficult about that concept to you?

[Tzimisce]

I’m sorry, the liberals you voted for did this.

What do you want me to say?